• Gear
  • Shots
  • Photo Craft
  • Video
  • Wide Angle
  • Support
  • New Stuff
  • More
Shots People too much skin post production? before/after

Need some help with your New SmugMug Site?

Dgrin Challenges

Our Challenges moderator has lined up an new set of challenges for you. The Weekly Word Challenge. Get all the details and participate in the conversation Weekly Word Challenge.

Past DSS Challenge Winners, DSS Challenge Rules, and other important DSS Challenge information is here.

Looking for a little challenge? The Dgrin Mini-Challenges are a great way to challenge yourself. Take a moment to look through past winners and find the current Mini Challenge here.

From Around the Net

Enjoy a few of our favorite articles from around the 'net. If you have something you think we should see, post it here and we'll have a look.

Journeys

Landscapes

Sports

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Oct-18-2007, 01:33 AM
#1
Jaraviss is offline Jaraviss OP
Major grins
Huh too much skin post production? before/after
first attempt at editing skin in photoshop.
(ignore the flat lighting for now...just want to know what you think about the skin fix)

how much is too much?
is this too much? does it look fake?
do you have a before/after example that you can share?

thanks.
-G

__________________
equipment:
canon rebel XTi
18-55mm lens
60mm macro lens
75-300mm telephoto lens
canon speelite 580 EXII
Old Oct-18-2007, 05:20 AM
#2
rustic is offline rustic
Major grins
rustic's Avatar
I'd say yes, too much, especially on the face and shoulders. I don't have any of my own examples, but normal skin just isn't that uniform.

I do think that the color is better in the second image (on my uncalibrated monitor).
__________________
http://rustic.smugmug.com
Old Oct-18-2007, 06:03 AM
#3
BertWagner is offline BertWagner
Big grins
I agree with rustic: too much softening on the face. I think especially with the cheeks, they can be a little crisper to show some definition instead of being totally smoothed over. I think the amount of correcting of the shoulders is fine though.

And it looks like you've lowered the amount of blue in the skin in the original photo (good!) but now I think there is too much green/yellow in your corrected photo (but I'm still waking up so I might be seeing things ).
Old Oct-18-2007, 07:02 AM
#4
Flyinggina is offline Flyinggina
To see and not be seen
Flyinggina's Avatar
I am no expert, but I personally like the glamour treatment and I'll bet the subject does too. YOu can try reducing the opacity on your final layer to let some of the detail from the original show through, just to see what you think. I suspect, though, that improving the lighting to create more depth in the face will make a big difference.

If you haven't seen it, this thread might interest you on the subject of portrait retouching.

Beautiful model by the way.

Virginia
__________________
_______________________________________________
"A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus

Email
Old Oct-18-2007, 10:59 AM
#5
k2butter is offline k2butter
Major grins
k2butter's Avatar
If I didn't see the before shots, I probably would not think it was too much, compared to the originals though, I think it is a bit too much, BUT I think you did a really great job, I have seen a lot of very poor samples of "fixing" skin your technique is very professional looking.
Old Oct-18-2007, 11:18 AM
#6
rwells is online now rwells
Let the shootin' begin...
rwells's Avatar
Good questions...

First:
Do YOU like the skin treatment toward your goal?


Second:
I like the skin treatment for this kind of shot. (generalization here)
If your going for more of a glamor shot, I think your on-track.


What woman would rather have a (glamor) portrait that shows off her flaws? That's what I thought...

She sees "accurate" everyday in her mirror. If that's what this woman wanted, she wouldn't wear ANY makeup, which of course she does.


Everyone wants to look their best, even if that takes some manipulation. She has some splotchy skin, I think in this type shot she would rather not showcase that.

Again, I think your on-track for you goal
__________________
Randy

Last edited by rwells; Oct-18-2007 at 11:29 AM.
Old Oct-18-2007, 01:26 PM
#7
Jaraviss is offline Jaraviss OP
Major grins
thanks everyone
i think i'll take your comments and reshoot

1. concentrate on getting a better shot first (with lighting/exposure/etc).
2. careful attention to color rendering
3. find a "happy medium" on the retouching...
a. too much = glamour..ok for some shots
b. lower a little to bring out more natural features.

thanks again!

one day i'll repost and see how i've improved.

thanks for the link too!
very imformative tutorial.

i love it.
-G
__________________
equipment:
canon rebel XTi
18-55mm lens
60mm macro lens
75-300mm telephoto lens
canon speelite 580 EXII
Old Oct-20-2007, 05:44 PM
#8
gmonkeh is offline gmonkeh
Reverb Photography
Hi Jaraviss,

This is a little late but the skin is a tad overdone. You've lost all the detail in her skin, and bit too much softening.

Here's an example of what I think works, but it's just me. Some people might think mine is overdone as well, just a matter of personal opinion.

__________________
http://www.reverbphotography.com
Nikon D300
Nikkor 85mm f/1.8D
Tamron 28-75 f/2.8
Nikkor 80-200 AF-D ED f/2.8
2 Alien Bees AB800
Nikon Speedlight SB800
Elinchrome Skyport Triggers
Old Oct-21-2007, 12:41 AM
#9
Jaraviss is offline Jaraviss OP
Major grins
cool thank you!
when i get another shot (a better shot to start with, that is)..i'll try again.

p.s. the eyes on yoru 2nd image are *AMAZING*
they really draw you in and are so "crisp"!!!

LOVE IT!


-G
__________________
equipment:
canon rebel XTi
18-55mm lens
60mm macro lens
75-300mm telephoto lens
canon speelite 580 EXII
Tell The World!  

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump