| Lurk all you'd like, but why not register and post some pics? Registering also makes it easier to find the good stuff. Need help? |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Shooters | Calendar | Reviews | Tutorials | Gallery | Books | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hold the meat
|
The Blue Light Special
Attention Dgrin Photoshoppers
![]() Photo submitted by a wedding pro, he'd like to be able to correct the colors on this in as few steps as possible. What would you do with this image, and why? What are the fewest steps you can make to make it better? What extra steps, or other steps, would you take that you consider to be "advanced"? Please list your steps, and screen grabs are very useful! ![]() The original shot is located here
__________________
Andy SmugMug COO, General Manager, House Pro & Dgrin Admin • Moon River Photography • League of Creative Infrared Photographers |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Major grins
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 790
|
I am not the great at PS, so I thought this could be a cool test for me, I took his photo and made my changes, now I'll wait and see how much better and easier the good PS guys do it. I have learned 75% of what I know about PS from reading threads like this.
James. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Big grins
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
The problems with this shoot were numerous. Originally set up as outdoor and all settings were ready. Rain forced it indoor at the last minute with no time to set up my lights. Picture was taken handheld bouncing the flash off the ceiling to avoid major blowback off the wood behind them. White balance was set to "flash" but is way off because of the bounce. This whole wedding has been a nightmare to try to process because exposures varied based on distance to subject changing with different group sizes. Additional problem is that when I'm done with a pic and apply the ezprints icc profile to soft proof it the profile desaturates it and makes it look muddy. Adjusting for this to get a good print makes the pic look severely oversaturated for web display. I've used every tip from Smugmug and other sites to make sure my monitor is right. I make sure the skin tones are right by the numbers in PS. I've gotten unadjusted test prints from several labs (all from Fuji Frontier 370 machines) and they match my soft proof output with the ezp icc applied (muddy). Why would properly displaying pics print muddy? Why would pics that print well and look good in PS look oversaturated in all other applications including web display? The client has payed to get the digital files so they need to both display and print properly. Has anybody else had issues with the ezprints icc profile desaturating their output?
__________________
If the world is our playground, why do we have to work?
Last edited by HvnyMem : Jan-03-2006 at 03:40 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Hold the meat
|
Quote:
Hi Ernie, welcome to Dgrin! Standby, folks will be helping I'm sure of it.
__________________
Andy SmugMug COO, General Manager, House Pro & Dgrin Admin • Moon River Photography • League of Creative Infrared Photographers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Major grins
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 246
|
well, I don't consider myself an expert but I took a shot at color correcting. I cropped it first. I just used curves and then color adjusted it by subtracting a little cyan. As far as the other stuff I can't help you..Sorry and good luck!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hold the meat
|
Sometimes, you can overthink things. This is a fine image - but the white dress and white jacket have a magenta cast. Look and see what a few dead-simple adjustments can do. Of course, you can Dan Magulis or Scott Kelby this image 8 ways to Sunday - but honestly, any of the three corrections shown here are a HUGE improvement on the original, and will result in a fine print.
Ernie's Original ![]() SmugMug's Auto Color (photo tools>color effects>auto color) ![]() Photoshop Auto Levels ![]() Photoshop Curves - ONLY selecting the white point with dropper (right upper portion of her bustline) ![]() That said, let's see what the rest of the experts come up with! ![]()
__________________
Andy SmugMug COO, General Manager, House Pro & Dgrin Admin • Moon River Photography • League of Creative Infrared Photographers |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Scripting dude
|
Workflow steps - color correction and other...
Quote:
I am not an expert at this when things get really complicated, but this image seems to be pretty easy for color correction. It also has a bunch of other things going on in it. The highly simplified scheme for color correction:
Here's what we started with: ![]() Here's what I get after the above method of color correction. All pieces of the image that should be neutral now seem pretty close to neutral and the skin tone on the woman seems to be what it should be when looking at the CMYK values. ![]() Now, there are many other things to look at in this photo including:
First, I look at the shadow detail. I make a duplicate copy of the background layer and set it to luminosity blend mode (so we will only be adjusting brightness, not color). I bring up the shadow/highlights control and adjust the shadow control a bit to bring out some detail in the lower shadows. After that adjustment, I get this: ![]() Now, I decide that the gown and man's shirt are a little too bright. I create a curve adjustment layer (again in luminosity blend mode) and pull down just the top tones a bit. I try to keep the mid-tones as they are. That gives me this: ![]() Now, I decide to attack the distortion in the picture. I'm after a couple of goals. The two columns on either side of the couple should be parallel to each other and to the edge of the image. The lines in the background should be parallel to sides or top so as to not look crooked. I create a duplicate layer of what we have so far (Ctrl-Alt-Shift-E) and use Edit/Transform/Skew to reach the above goals. I ignore a few edges that got clipped in the transformation because I know a crop is coming that will take care of that. That gives me this: ![]() Then, I apply some smart sharpening to get this: ![]() Then, I crop to eliminate all the dead space above and below and to even up the sides. This puts the image closer to an 8x10 ratio. Here's what it is after the crop: ![]() And then lastly, I decide that the faces are a bit too dark. I create a curve adjustment layer in luminosity blend mode, add a curve and mask out everything except the two faces to brighten just the faces a bit. How much to do, particularly on the groom, is probably a subject of opinion. I don't want to change his features or apparent race, but with all the dark background, we need to be able to see his face too. If I were the photographer and this was an important photo in the portfolio, I'd probably prepare a couple versions to see what the couple liked on this last step. This is what I end up with: ![]() I hope this was useful.
__________________
--John Homepage, Popular Photos, Portfolio If you are asking for help, please include a clickable link to your Smugmug site (full URL including the http://). It's easiest for everyone if you add it to your dgrin signature so it's always there. For a list of popular javascript customizations, go here. If you wonder why your post might not be getting an answer, read this. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Hold the meat
|
Quote:
Don't underestimate your skills - nice work - and YES very useful! Notice that there's not much difference between your first edit, and either of the two "quick fixes" I showed: Nice work, John, and thanks for playing "The Blue Light Special" OH I like the shadow recovery touch. I'd recommend a bit less though, taking it back by maybe 25% or somesuch. More on Shadow Recovery, Here on dgrin.smugmug.com (Smug Auto, Photoshop Auto Levels, John Friend's First Edit) ![]()
__________________
Andy SmugMug COO, General Manager, House Pro & Dgrin Admin • Moon River Photography • League of Creative Infrared Photographers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Life is good!
|
That doesn't look like his final edited version?
![]() edit: Doh! just re-read it, sorry! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Hold the meat
|
Quote:
Taking the "quick fix" a bit further, using PS CS2 Shadow / Highlight Function: Photoshop Auto Levels and then Shadow Highlight Adjustment in CS2 (18% on all sliders in Shadow and Highlight) ![]() More here on dgrin.smugmug.com: http://dgrin.smugmug.com/gallery/1077615 http://dgrin.smugmug.com/gallery/1077611
__________________
Andy SmugMug COO, General Manager, House Pro & Dgrin Admin • Moon River Photography • League of Creative Infrared Photographers |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|