the dgrin suggestion box

[ian408]

There's a definite interest in HDR. We'll definitely think about it.

Thanks!

[ian408]

Originally Posted by ian408

There's a definite interest in HDR. We'll definitely think about it.

Upon further reflection, we're going to leave things as they are. Why? Because at its core, HDR is just another tool in the photographer's processing toolbox. As such, it doesn't really warrant a separate forum.

Thanks again for the suggestion.

[rwells]

Would it be useful here on dgrin, as on other sites, to have a "Lens Sample Photo Archive"?

I personally find them very useful when I'm considering purchase of a new lens. I also like that you can usually tell what body the lens is mounted to. I like to be able to "see" what a lens/body combination produces over a wide swath of photographers.

In the past, I've considered a certain lens/focal length, only to peruse that particular lens photo archive. It became obvious if that lens would be a good tool for a particular need.

Here is a lens sample photo archive from another site for reference.

[StueveShots]

I'm wondering if there has been consideration given to creating a forum to feature photos that have been post-processed in specific styles (Orton effects, impressionism, expressionism, non-realistic HDR, etc.)--maybe even to the point where some may consider the work to be graphic design or art.

The reason for my suggestion is this: I noticed (during my brief time posting) that some folks play around quite freely and creatively in processing programs like Photoshop, but when they post their work for feedback the comments weigh heavily toward ideas like "the color doesn't look realistic" or "this isn't real photography". If there were to be a thread for these non-realistic styles of processing, then the participants might get more constructive criticism on the aesthetics of their choices rather than philosophical debate about what makes a photograph truly a photograph. (Although I'd be the last to say that such a debate--in proper settings --isn't good! I'm a theatre professor by training...we debate "veritas" all the time.)

Perhaps this already exists and is just buried someplace I haven't found.

Or maybe there is just an absolute rule that there will be no more forums! Either way, fine with me! Just a thought.

(And, hey, I'm new here...so if this idea has been floated and shot down, just let me know!)

[ian408]

Originally Posted by StueveShots

I'm wondering if there has been consideration given to creating a forum to feature photos that have been post-processed in specific styles (Orton effects, impressionism, expressionism, non-realistic HDR, etc.)--maybe even to the point where some may consider the work to be graphic design or art.

We do consider each request and regarding this type of request, no. We won't create forums for specific processing techniques. Doing so would create needless clutter and really isn't practical given the huge variety of different techniques.

[StueveShots]

Originally Posted by ian408

We do consider each request and regarding this type of request, no. We won't create forums for specific processing techniques. Doing so would create needless clutter and really isn't practical given the huge variety of different techniques.

Makes sense. I wasn't thinking of a forum for each and every type. Just one general forum for all non-traditional styles. Individual threads could handle the various styles as posters saw fit.

But even that may be too much. Thanks for considering it anyway!

Edited to add: I should say that I've been spending much more time in "Other Cool Shots" these last few days and have noticed that in that thread posters and responders are quite amenable to people experimenting with different processing styles. So my concern that there wasn't a spot for this may be unfounded!

[basflt]

^^
its easy to create a thread yourself in other cool shots , like ;post all your Orton effects, in here [ for example ]

if it is used enough , they might even make it a sticky

[racer]

Not sure if it is being planned any, but I suggest that the forum be upgraded to vBulletin v4. I understand that it is a major upgrade, but I think the added features are definantly worth it!

[ian408]

Originally Posted by racer

Not sure if it is being planned any, but I suggest that the forum be upgraded to vBulletin v4. I understand that it is a major upgrade, but I think the added features are definantly worth it!

Thanks for the suggestion. We're excited about the new features as well but until 4 stabilizes, we're going to stick with the current version.

[racer]

Originally Posted by ian408

Thanks for the suggestion. We're excited about the new features as well but until 4 stabilizes, we're going to stick with the current version.

makes sense

[57guy]

I disagree with you on HDR. A lot of Photographers are getting into it and its a process of its own. In the future, I will only visits sites that have an HDR section. I can see where you would not have a section on "Night Shots" "landscape" "City Walks", etc. But they do not have dedicated software for those types of Photography.
Glenn

[ian408]

Originally Posted by 57guy

I disagree with you on HDR. A lot of Photographers are getting into it and its a process of its own. In the future, I will only visits sites that have an HDR section. I can see where you would not have a section on "Night Shots" "landscape" "City Walks", etc. But they do not have dedicated software for those types of Photography.
Glenn

Following this, you'd post shots with HDR in the HDR section--what if it's a sports shot? Would you cross post? What about a PJ shot, would that go in PJ or HDR?

Shots should be posted, regardless of their processing technique, in their respective forums.

IF you want to discuss the software for HDR, you can do that in the Finishing School forum. Plenty of folks to help with the wide variety of software available to us.

[rwells]

I reposted this due to no response the first posting:

Would it be useful here on dgrin, as on other sites, to have a "Lens Sample Photo Archive"?

I personally find them very useful when I'm considering purchase of a new lens. I also like that you can usually tell what body the lens is mounted to. I like to be able to "see" what a lens/body combination produces over a wide swath of photographers.

In the past, I've considered a certain lens/focal length, only to peruse that particular lens photo archive. It became obvious if that lens would be a good tool for a particular need.

Here is a lens sample photo archive from another site for reference.

[DavidTO]

Originally Posted by rwells

I reposted this due to no response the first posting:

Would it be useful here on dgrin, as on other sites, to have a "Lens Sample Photo Archive"?

I personally find them very useful when I'm considering purchase of a new lens. I also like that you can usually tell what body the lens is mounted to. I like to be able to "see" what a lens/body combination produces over a wide swath of photographers.

In the past, I've considered a certain lens/focal length, only to peruse that particular lens photo archive. It became obvious if that lens would be a good tool for a particular need.

Here is a lens sample photo archive from another site for reference.

Thanks!

[jeff lapoint]

There was a great quote by Erik several pages back about not over moderating the B/S forum. With that in mind I'd like to suggest finally allowing members to mark their own threads *sold* or be allowed to close them. Doc could still zap ones there forever or close them for people who don't know how. Having old threads around and sold items appear active takes a bit of the glow off an otherwise awesome board.

[ian408]

Originally Posted by jeff lapoint

There was a great quote by Erik several pages back about not over moderating the B/S forum. With that in mind I'd like to suggest finally allowing members to mark their own threads *sold* or be allowed to close them. Doc could still zap ones there forever or close them for people who don't know how. Having old threads around and sold items appear active takes a bit of the glow off an otherwise awesome board.

Thanks for the suggestion. We'll take this up amongst ourselves and let you know.