Options

Knocking off the rust... Hoda and Aaron

mmmattmmmatt Registered Users Posts: 1,347 Major grins
edited May 22, 2011 in Weddings
Been awhile! Here is a session from a couple weeks ago. These are from the grounds of UW Madison. C&C is always appreciated.

01.
IMG0762-XL.jpg

02.
IMG0772-L.jpg

03. That is the Wisconsin state capital in the background.
IMG0784-L.jpg

04.
IMG0797-XL.jpg

05.
IMG0846-XL.jpg

06.
IMG0878-XL.jpg

07.
IMG0926-L.jpg

08.
IMG0932-L.jpg

09.
IMG0940-XL.jpg

10.
IMG0952-XL.jpg

11.
IMG0977-L.jpg

12.
IMG0989-XL.jpg

13.
IMG0999-XL.jpg

14.
IMG1009-L.jpg

Thanks!!

Matt
My Smugmug site

Bodies: Canon 5d mkII, 5d, 40d
Lenses: 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4.0L, 135 f2L, 85 f1.8, 50 1.8, 100 f2.8 macro, Tamron 28-105 f2.8
Flash: 2x 580 exII, Canon ST-E2, 2x Pocket Wizard flexTT5, and some lower end studio strobes

Comments

  • Options
    heatherfeatherheatherfeather Registered Users Posts: 2,738 Major grins
    edited May 14, 2011
    Mmatt! These are really great! I made a bunch of "oooh" sounds and then got to 12... holey schmoley, that is a gorgeous shot. Love the pano crop.

    What is going on in 13? It is really interesting, and I can't figure out if you are looking into a porthole somewhere or if you have snooted your flash.
    Heather
    my website
    facebook
  • Options
    mmmattmmmatt Registered Users Posts: 1,347 Major grins
    edited May 14, 2011
    heatherfeather wrote: »
    Mmatt! These are really great! I made a bunch of "oooh" sounds and then got to 12... holey schmoley, that is a gorgeous shot. Love the pano crop.

    What is going on in 13? It is really interesting, and I can't figure out if you are looking into a porthole somewhere or if you have snooted your flash.

    Well thanks Heather!! #13 is a porthole on the underside of the footbridge from # 04. It is actually 2 holes lined up in either side of the bridge supports. I was standing on a stair railing and my off camera strobe was by them. the thing that makes it confusing, and fun for me, is the flash spilling on the dirt under the bridge. I just noticed I went over the edge on my burn on 12, otherwise I like that one too! I think I'll redo that one! grrrr... (now replaced)

    Matt
    My Smugmug site

    Bodies: Canon 5d mkII, 5d, 40d
    Lenses: 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4.0L, 135 f2L, 85 f1.8, 50 1.8, 100 f2.8 macro, Tamron 28-105 f2.8
    Flash: 2x 580 exII, Canon ST-E2, 2x Pocket Wizard flexTT5, and some lower end studio strobes
  • Options
    FoquesFoques Registered Users Posts: 1,951 Major grins
    edited May 17, 2011
    mmmatt, could you share why you chose to go with 800-1600-3200 iso ranges?
    Was it cloudy?
    Arseny - the too honest guy.
    My Site
    My Facebook
  • Options
    mmmattmmmatt Registered Users Posts: 1,347 Major grins
    edited May 17, 2011
    Foques wrote: »
    mmmatt, could you share why you chose to go with 800-1600-3200 iso ranges?
    Was it cloudy?

    Ha ha. Well the easy answer there is "because I can". If you don't have a camera that is capable of good quality 1600+ ISO, then you are really missing out. I do understand that not everyone can own one of the handful of bodies that excel at high iso, but for a wedding photog I would say it is probably the biggest technological advance since digital slrs.

    It was definitely cloudy/overcast, and at the end it was pitch black dark. At the table by the water shot (12) I could barely get my lens to autofocus it was so dark. For most of these, other than the ones where they are walking, I was using off camera flash. My (typical) goal when flashing outside is to make it seem natuaral and unflashed. Not to say I always achieve that because I don't, but I am sensitive to the "over flashed" look. The key to the ballanced look is balancing flash and ambient, and to do that you need to either adjust your flash, and adjust your iso, and/or shutter or aperture. Even though shutter and aperture are great ways to add more ambient light, they also play a big part in other facets of the shot such as motion blur, depth of field, and focal plane. Since my images are mostly unaffected by my iso adjustment, I often choose to ride the iso setting as the ambient levels reduce, so that I can otherwise control the settings that have more dramatic effects on my work.

    I hope that answers your question!

    Matt
    My Smugmug site

    Bodies: Canon 5d mkII, 5d, 40d
    Lenses: 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4.0L, 135 f2L, 85 f1.8, 50 1.8, 100 f2.8 macro, Tamron 28-105 f2.8
    Flash: 2x 580 exII, Canon ST-E2, 2x Pocket Wizard flexTT5, and some lower end studio strobes
  • Options
    FoquesFoques Registered Users Posts: 1,951 Major grins
    edited May 17, 2011
    that's quite a bright image for only 1600 in such a dark space..

    my camera is easily handling 3200ish, I asked because I thought maybe there is a trick that I wasn't aware about. thank you for answering this :)
    Arseny - the too honest guy.
    My Site
    My Facebook
  • Options
    mmmattmmmatt Registered Users Posts: 1,347 Major grins
    edited May 18, 2011
    Foques wrote: »
    that's quite a bright image for only 1600 in such a dark space..

    my camera is easily handling 3200ish, I asked because I thought maybe there is a trick that I wasn't aware about. thank you for answering this :)

    Well it wasn't black at that point but sun was officially down! These are all processed iin PS too. I'm not sure what you mean by a trick... A trick to what?

    This is a rare occasion that I shot raw + jpg though, and here are a couple straight out of camera. The first is the original of #12 and the 2nd is one a couple frames after with the flash no firing so you can see how much the flash is doing to the image.

    sooc 1
    i-k8qQZq2-L.jpg


    sooc 2
    i-td4CwnN-L.jpg

    Both of these are f5, 1/30th, 1600 iso

    Matt
    My Smugmug site

    Bodies: Canon 5d mkII, 5d, 40d
    Lenses: 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4.0L, 135 f2L, 85 f1.8, 50 1.8, 100 f2.8 macro, Tamron 28-105 f2.8
    Flash: 2x 580 exII, Canon ST-E2, 2x Pocket Wizard flexTT5, and some lower end studio strobes
  • Options
    FoquesFoques Registered Users Posts: 1,951 Major grins
    edited May 18, 2011
    makes sense. thank you!
    Arseny - the too honest guy.
    My Site
    My Facebook
  • Options
    ShimaShima Registered Users Posts: 2,547 Major grins
    edited May 21, 2011
    Great series Matt, very well composed and sharp :)
    Photography by Cat || My Gear List
    Facebook: Friend / Fan || Twitter: @shimamizu || Google Plus
  • Options
    TEphotosTEphotos Registered Users Posts: 23 Big grins
    edited May 21, 2011
    Very nice set Matt :)
    I love what I do, and I do what I love!
    http://www.tanyaeverettphotography.com/
    http://tanyaeverettphotography.blogspot.com/
  • Options
    mmmattmmmatt Registered Users Posts: 1,347 Major grins
    edited May 21, 2011
    Thanks Ladies. Welcome to dgrin Tanya!!!

    Matt
    My Smugmug site

    Bodies: Canon 5d mkII, 5d, 40d
    Lenses: 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4.0L, 135 f2L, 85 f1.8, 50 1.8, 100 f2.8 macro, Tamron 28-105 f2.8
    Flash: 2x 580 exII, Canon ST-E2, 2x Pocket Wizard flexTT5, and some lower end studio strobes
  • Options
    stirinthesaucestirinthesauce Registered Users Posts: 293 Major grins
    edited May 21, 2011
    Great job Matt!

    Really like 11 and 12
    My Website
  • Options
    DarrakDarrak Registered Users Posts: 8 Beginner grinner
    edited May 22, 2011
    Beautiful I really like the color conversion in #12.
  • Options
    mmmattmmmatt Registered Users Posts: 1,347 Major grins
    edited May 22, 2011
    Thanks guys!
    My Smugmug site

    Bodies: Canon 5d mkII, 5d, 40d
    Lenses: 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4.0L, 135 f2L, 85 f1.8, 50 1.8, 100 f2.8 macro, Tamron 28-105 f2.8
    Flash: 2x 580 exII, Canon ST-E2, 2x Pocket Wizard flexTT5, and some lower end studio strobes
Sign In or Register to comment.