Winged Angel

Derweissehai · January 15, 2009

Here is ad different outfit from Sunday

Darren Troy C · January 15, 2009

Love the concept of the first one. There are some "scuff" marks or something on the floor that are distracting. Love the pose and lighting.

Again, love the pose here for the second. To me, it looks pretty soft however. I like the lighting here as well.

THe best of the bunch for the third one.

These may be a little more suited for the "Go Figure" forum, however.

Beautiful girl.

System · January 15, 2009

Not everything showing a woman needs to go in the Go Figure forum. There's plenty of glamour shots in the general People forum.

In #1 there's a lot of scuffs on the floor etc, the spotlight works but it really brings out blemishes on the floor. In the lower right of the frame you can see a leg from a tripod or something.

In #3 her skin needs some smoothing, there's a lot of tiny hairs on her back and the side lighting makes them look huge.

In general I'd say they're ok but practice makes perfect. It's a good thing that genre is so fun to shoot!

Richard · January 15, 2009

MagicKiwi wrote:

Not everything showing a woman needs to go in the Go Figure forum. There's plenty of glamour shots in the general People forum

Agreed. But does it really matter which forum it goes in? Both People and Go Figure are viewed by Dgrinners with an interest in glam photography.

Nikolai · January 15, 2009

Love the spotlight effect on the #1, cool idea and execution!

heatherfeather · January 15, 2009

Richard wrote:

Agreed. But does it really matter which forum it goes in? Both People and Go Figure are viewed by Dgrinners with an interest in glam photography.

True- and my kids really appreciate it when I have a bit of warning before viewing underwear shots or nudes. I appreciate the op's posting it in here so I can choose the moments when I don't have little people peeping over my shoulders to view them. I do occasional work like this so I always like to keep up on how to do these... and appreciate the tasteful placement in the gofigure forum.

BTW these shots are beautiful. My fav is #2 but wish there were less shadows on her face. I think she has a great expression but it is hard to tell for sure with the shadows.

schmoo · January 15, 2009

My favorite is the first, with great lighting, pose, and her expression. wow!

Agreed, the scuff marks on the floor are a bit distracting (and certainly take away from the surreal aspect of the photo) but those should be an easy fix should you choose to do so.

sweet caroline · January 15, 2009

heatherfeather wrote:

True- and my kids really appreciate it when I have a bit of warning before viewing underwear shots or nudes. I appreciate the op's posting it in here so I can choose the moments when I don't have little people peeping over my shoulders to view them. I do occasional work like this so I always like to keep up on how to do these... and appreciate the tasteful placement in the gofigure forum.

BTW these shots are beautiful. My fav is #2 but wish there were less shadows on her face. I think she has a great expression but it is hard to tell for sure with the shadows.

Exactly!

Caroline

Derweissehai · January 15, 2009

Thanks everyone. True these could go in both forums......but I chose here to post. At least at work most of us will not open. I know some people get offended easily when looking at a beautiful woman in sexy poses. I will work on the scuffs in post. Not much was done to these yet except the name and maybe some curves.

angevin1 · January 15, 2009

#3

Nice to see a womans' back sans ink!

la, tom

Derweissehai · January 16, 2009

angevin1 wrote:

#3

Nice to see a womans' back sans ink!

la, tom

Thanks Tom.

JDub · January 29, 2009

That first image is fantastic, I can see a little bit of the stand on the right, but a little cropping will fix that! Awesome!

Derweissehai · February 1, 2009

Thanks JD...I saw it after I posted....doh!

Winged Angel

Comments