Would these be considered "landscape" photos or??

superduckz · December 10, 2012

A few that I'm proud of but I don't know how to categorize them... even in my own albums. Bridges are becoming a bit of a thing for me. Since we have a LOT of them in Jacksonville I keep finding a lot of shots in this genre. I don't think it's quite architectural (is it?). It seems to be broad enough "scale" for landscape but it's not exactly all natural. Any opinions much appreciated.

Angelo · December 11, 2012

I see them as very cool and certainly architectural. All other arguments would be subjective anyway.

superduckz · December 11, 2012

Thanks. Yeah thinking about it now my question is a bit silly. Even though they are broad in scope they're obviously architectural. They're bridges for crying out loud!

. I'm newish to this and I'm discovering that all my years working as a draftsmen is influencing my style in ways that surprise me a bit. Fun stuff.

Angelo · December 11, 2012

Shoot what you know...it's a good formula

Earache · December 12, 2012

I like what you have done here superduckz - the dreamy smoothing is cool.
I have often looked at the concrete freeways out here as potential subjects - I think you have given me the prod to give it a go.

superduckz · December 12, 2012

That's Cool! Thanks Earache!

Florida is so darn flat that I sort of look at big manmade structures (like bridges, interesting stretches of road etc.) as a chance to practice a type of landscape photography. This is what led me to my original (somewhat misguided) question. I can only take so many photos of the more or less subjectless wide open spaces of sprawling marshes, beaches and open skies before I get in a bit of a funk.

Would these be considered "landscape" photos or??

Comments