Options
Pentax 645Z Affordable Medium Format digital body
http://www.us.ricoh-imaging.com/dslr/645Z
CMOS imager
Effective pixels: 51.40 MP
RAW: L (51M: 8256 x 6192)
3 FPS frame rate
Movie (resolution/FPS): Full HD (1920x1080, 60i/50i/30p/25p/24p), HD (1280x720, 60p/50p/30p/25p/24p)
PENTAX 645AF2 lens mount with AF coupler, lens information contacts, and power contacts
AF: SAFOX 11 TTL phase-matching autofocus with 27 AF points (25 cross type focus points in the center)
AF modes: Single AF (AF.S), Continuous AF (AF.C)
Viewfinder: Type: Keplerian telescopic trapezoid prism finder
Coverage (field of view): Approx. 98%
Magnification: Approx. 0.62 x (55mmF2.8 at infinity), Approx. 0.85 x (75mmF2.8 at infinity)
Standard focusing screen: Interchangeable Natural-Bright-Matte focusing screen
LCD Monitor: Type: 3.2” Tiltable TFT color LCD monitor featuring an air-gapless structure with an AR-coated, tempered-glass front panel
External Flash: Type: Hotshoe (P-TTL), high speed sync and wireless w PENTAX dedicated flash, X-Sync Socket
Storage Media: Removable memory: SD, SDHC*, SDXC* memory card, Eye-Fi card, FLUCARD *UHS-I compatible
Dual Card Slot: Sequential save, Save to Both Dual save, Separate RAW/JPG, Copying images between slots possible
HDMI output terminal (Type D), Stereo microphone input terminal
~Price: $8,498.00 (B&H), $8,496.95 (Adorama)
CMOS imager
Effective pixels: 51.40 MP
RAW: L (51M: 8256 x 6192)
3 FPS frame rate
Movie (resolution/FPS): Full HD (1920x1080, 60i/50i/30p/25p/24p), HD (1280x720, 60p/50p/30p/25p/24p)
PENTAX 645AF2 lens mount with AF coupler, lens information contacts, and power contacts
AF: SAFOX 11 TTL phase-matching autofocus with 27 AF points (25 cross type focus points in the center)
AF modes: Single AF (AF.S), Continuous AF (AF.C)
Viewfinder: Type: Keplerian telescopic trapezoid prism finder
Coverage (field of view): Approx. 98%
Magnification: Approx. 0.62 x (55mmF2.8 at infinity), Approx. 0.85 x (75mmF2.8 at infinity)
Standard focusing screen: Interchangeable Natural-Bright-Matte focusing screen
LCD Monitor: Type: 3.2” Tiltable TFT color LCD monitor featuring an air-gapless structure with an AR-coated, tempered-glass front panel
External Flash: Type: Hotshoe (P-TTL), high speed sync and wireless w PENTAX dedicated flash, X-Sync Socket
Storage Media: Removable memory: SD, SDHC*, SDXC* memory card, Eye-Fi card, FLUCARD *UHS-I compatible
Dual Card Slot: Sequential save, Save to Both Dual save, Separate RAW/JPG, Copying images between slots possible
HDMI output terminal (Type D), Stereo microphone input terminal
~Price: $8,498.00 (B&H), $8,496.95 (Adorama)
0
Comments
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/pentax-645z/pentax-645zA.HTM
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2014/04/15/hands-on-with-the-pentax-645z?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=news-list&utm_medium=text&ref=title_0
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Since it uses the same sensor as the Hasselblad, and the Phase One along with what seems like fantastic performance why would one consider buying ether the Hasselblad, or Phase One?
Sam
Yeah seriously. Only way the H or PO would be worth it is if they have visibly superior superior image processing which yields at least twice the DR, and better color, tonality, sharpness, etc.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
Folks who already have a significant investment in lenses and accessories may wish to stay in a particular system.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
For the cost of a new Hasselblad or Phase One, they could sell all their gear, replace it with Pentax gear, and probably come out many thousands ahead. Unless the lenses are really SO much better that they warrant hanging on to a $50,000+ system. I guess if you are a corporation like Macy's producing catalogs this is tiddlywinks, but I would think every independent MF photographer should be looking very seriously at Pentax.
Photography is a big part of my retirement plan, I will be looking at a Pentax or similar MF system then!
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
Link to my Smugmug site
I'm not sure. There has to be some firmware between the electrical readings of the sensor pixels, and the outputted raw file. If that firmware is written by the sensor manufacturer and the sensor is basically a "black box" which spits out a raw file, then you'd be right. I don't know if that's how it is though. The subtle differences between Nikons and Sonys make me wonder.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
Don't get me wrong, I'm a big fan of Pentax. That's how I started in serious photography. I still own several Pentax and compatible 135 format film bodies, a plethora of lenses (including 2 - 500mm, f4.5 lenses) and assorted accessories for the system.
Pentax, and now Ricoh (the current owners), are great innovators in photography, and they often beat their competition in both features and price.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
I believe that the Nikon D7000, Pentax K-5 and Sony A580 dSLRs are based on the same, or very similar, Sony based imager. However, there are measurable differences between the RAW files of identical scenes.
I believe that all of these cameras use a different image processor, different internal shielding, and different image software processing profile (for both DXO and Adobe RAW processing). These differences are likely reasons for the differences. (This is not meant to be either a definitive or an exhaustive listing of differences.)
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
I wasn't questioning your friendliness to Pentax, I was just saying I can't imagine a reason to stick with Hasselblad or Phase One. Lens collection or not.
I got started with my parents' K1000 when I was a kid. I still have an MX and 3 primes that I love to use on occasion.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.