smugmug.com in the news!

fishfish Registered Users Posts: 2,950 Major grins
edited December 6, 2004 in The Big Picture
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/10334362.htm?1c

Navy probes new Iraq prisoner photos

SETH HETTENA
Associated Press



CORONADO, Calif. - The U.S. military has launched a criminal investigation into photographs that appear to show Navy SEALs in Iraq sitting on hooded and handcuffed detainees, and photos of what appear to be bloodied prisoners, one with a gun to his head.

Some of the photos have date stamps suggesting they were taken in May 2003, which could make them the earliest evidence of possible abuse of prisoners in Iraq. The far more brutal practices photographed in Abu Ghraib prison occurred months later.

An Associated Press reporter found more than 40 of the pictures among hundreds in an album posted on a commercial photo-sharing Web site by a woman who said her husband brought them from Iraq after his tour of duty. It is unclear who took the pictures, which the Navy said it was investigating after the AP furnished copies to get comment for this story.

These and other photos found by the AP appear to show the immediate aftermath of raids on civilian homes. One man is lying on his back with a boot on his chest. A mug shot shows a man with an automatic weapon pointed at his head and a gloved thumb jabbed into his throat. In many photos, faces have been blacked out. What appears to be blood drips from the heads of some. A family huddles in a room in one photo and others show debris and upturned furniture.

"These photographs raise a number of important questions regarding the treatment of prisoners of war (POWs) and detainees," Navy Cmdr. Jeff Bender, a spokesman for the Naval Special Warfare Command in Coronado, said in a written response to questions. "I can assure you that the matter will be thoroughly investigated."

The photos were turned over to the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, which instructed the SEAL command to determine whether they show any serious crimes, Bender said Friday. That investigation will determine the identities of the troops and what they were doing in the photos.

Some of the photos recall aspects of the images from Abu Ghraib, which led to charges against seven soldiers accused of humiliating and assaulting prisoners. In several of the photos obtained by the AP, grinning men wearing U.S. flags on their uniforms, and one with a tattoo of a SEAL trident, take turns sitting or lying atop what appear to be three hooded and handcuffed men in the bed of a pickup truck.

A reporter found the photos, which since have since been removed from public view, while researching the prosecution of a group of SEALs who allegedly beat prisoners and photographed one of them in degrading positions. Those photos, taken with a SEAL's personal camera, haven't been publicly released.

Though they have alarmed SEAL commanders, the photographs found by the AP do not necessarily show anything illegal, according to experts in the laws of war who reviewed photos at AP's request.

Gary Solis, a former Marine Corps prosecutor and judge who teaches at the United States Military Academy, said the images showed "stupid" and "juvenile" behavior - but not necessarily a crime.

John Hutson, a retired rear admiral who served as the Navy's Judge Advocate General from 1997 to 2000, said they suggested possible Geneva Convention violations. Those international laws prohibit souvenir photos of prisoners of war.

"It's pretty obvious that these pictures were taken largely as war trophies," Hutson said. "Once you start allowing that kind of behavior, the next step is to start posing the POWs in order to get even better pictures."

At a minimum, the pictures violate Navy regulations that prohibit photographing prisoners other than for intelligence or administrative purposes, according to Bender, the SEALs spokesman.

All Naval Special Warfare personnel were told that prior to deployment, he said, but "it is obvious from some of the photographs that this policy was not adhered to."

The images were posted to the Internet site Smugmug.com. The woman who posted them told the AP they were on the camera her husband brought back from Iraq. She said her husband has returned to Iraq. He does not appear in photos with prisoners.

The Navy goes to great lengths to protect the identities and whereabouts of its 2,400 SEALs - which stands for Navy Sea, Air, Land - many of whom have classified counterterrorist missions around the globe.

"Some of these photos clearly depict faces and names of Naval Special Warfare personnel, which could put them or their families at risk," Bender said.

Out of safety concerns, the AP is not identifying the woman who posted the photos.

The wife said she was upset that a reporter was able to view the album, which includes family snapshots. Hundreds of other photos depict everyday military life in Iraq, some showing commandos standing around piles of weapons and waving wads of cash.

The images were found through the online search engine Google. The same search today leads to the Smugmug.com Web page, which now prompts the user for a password. Nine scenes from the SEAL camp remain in Google's archived version of the page.

"I think it's fair to assume that it would be very hard for most consumers to know all the ways the search engines can discover Web pages," said Smugmug spokesman Chris MacAskill.


Before the site was password protected, the AP purchased reprints for 29 cents each.

Some men in the photos wear patches that identify them as members of Seal Team Five, based in Coronado, and the unit's V-shaped insignia decorates a July Fourth celebration cake.

The photos surfaced amid a case of prisoner abuse involving members of another SEAL team also stationed at Coronado, a city near San Diego.

Navy prosecutors have charged several members of SEAL Team Seven with abusing a suspect in the bombing a Red Cross facility. According to charge sheets and testimony during a military hearing last month, SEALs posed in the back of a Humvee for photos that allegedly humiliated Manadel al-Jamadi, who died hours later at Abu Ghraib.

Testimony from that case suggest personal cameras became increasingly common on some SEAL missions last year.
"Consulting the rules of composition before taking a photograph, is like consulting the laws of gravity before going for a walk." - Edward Weston
"The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."-Hunter S.Thompson

Comments

  • lynnmalynnma Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 5,207 Major grins
    edited December 4, 2004
    You know Fish? when I heard that on the news this morning and heard the words "photo sharing web site" I said to hubby of lynnma... I wonder if it's smugmug. Oh boy.. what does this mean I wonder. Makes one more aware of what one is posting in Smugmug and on dgrin. One forgets that big brother is always watching..... (not that I think it was a very cool thing to do, what was her point?) headscratch.gifeek7.gif
  • fishfish Registered Users Posts: 2,950 Major grins
    edited December 4, 2004
    I agree with you, lynnma. Never post anything you don't want everybody to see. At least password-protect sensitive galleries.

    Too, I think that's some amazing free publicity for smuggy. deal.gif
    "Consulting the rules of composition before taking a photograph, is like consulting the laws of gravity before going for a walk." - Edward Weston
    "The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."-Hunter S.Thompson
  • ginger_55ginger_55 Registered Users Posts: 8,416 Major grins
    edited December 4, 2004
    fish wrote:
    I agree with you, lynnma. Never post anything you don't want everybody to see. At least password-protect sensitive galleries.

    Too, I think that's some amazing free publicity for smuggy. deal.gif

    I have been asked twice by family members to please take, what are to them, sensitive photos off of my website. It wouldn't have occurred to me. One involved a rifle as in those adult games people play. I understand that could have hurt a career, and one involved a child who didn't have enough clothes on. Her mother was concerned.

    I just took them off, that is one reason I was concerned about asking for releases, particularly for the child in the angel portrait. It basically said I could do anything I wanted with the photo. My husband said they are standard releases and used all the time. I think the internet will change some things.

    ginger
    After all is said and done, it is the sweet tea.
  • gusgus Registered Users Posts: 16,209 Major grins
    edited December 5, 2004
    fish wrote:
    I agree with you, lynnma. Never post anything you don't want everybody to see. At least password-protect sensitive galleries.

    Too, I think that's some amazing free publicity for smuggy. deal.gif
    Hows it go ? Any advertising is good advertising.

    Years back here ..toyota released a new station wagon ..a camry. They hit the nation overnight with billboards of a pregnant womans belly...& the slogan "you will like our new wide body"

    Womans groups all over the nation raised their pitchforks & organised lynch mobs. It made the 6 pm news on ALL stations nation wide including the gov't non-commercial station & radio stations fed off talkback with it for weeks.

    People still think they kicked toyotas arse....idiots.
  • lynnmalynnma Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 5,207 Major grins
    edited December 5, 2004
    ginger_55 wrote:
    I have been asked twice by family members to please take, what are to them, sensitive photos off of my website. It wouldn't have occurred to me. One involved a rifle as in those adult games people play. I understand that could have hurt a career, and one involved a child who didn't have enough clothes on. Her mother was concerned.

    I just took them off, that is one reason I was concerned about asking for releases, particularly for the child in the angel portrait. It basically said I could do anything I wanted with the photo. My husband said they are standard releases and used all the time. I think the internet will change some things.

    ginger
    I've taken ALL my people shots off my site except the ones with no faces at all... I just don't trust what could happen and after it's happened?? it's too late. Call me paranoid but in this day and age anything is possible... one feels so vunerable these days does'nt one...eek7.gif
  • ginger_55ginger_55 Registered Users Posts: 8,416 Major grins
    edited December 5, 2004
    lynnma wrote:
    I've taken ALL my people shots off my site except the ones with no faces at all... I just don't trust what could happen and after it's happened?? it's too late. Call me paranoid but in this day and age anything is possible... one feels so vunerable these days does'nt one...eek7.gif

    I am not taking people pictures off of my site. That is one reason I have the site is to share. My people will tell me when they don't want a photo on there for whatever reason.

    I think evil and fear has always been present. As a child in the 1940s I was very aware of the Lindburgh kidnapping and worried about my safety constantly.
    Polio also concerned me, I hid and took my temperature all of the time.

    I think some of that has been forgotten in this day of much media coverage. But then that is just a pet peeve of mine, since I have wished my grandchildren have had more freedom, as my own kids did.

    The son who was shooting those "guns", the one I had the photo of, he is into politics locally in his hometown. That could have been a problem. Actually I was shooting the guns, and I wished that someone had taken a photo of me. Now I am anti guns in every way, so a photo of me like that would send an incorrect message, but it would not bother me that much. I should have thought of the political angle with my son.

    I could understand that woman putting those photos up, if we had not already had a scandal re abuse of Iraqis. Since the media already had made all of us aware of what was going on, and we were not happy about it, I would think she would have been aware, too, that those were not something to show the world, or to be proud of.

    I do have some password galleries, nothing shocking, don't even remember what are in some of them.

    I don't think parents should be signing consent forms in this day and age saying I can do anything with their child's photo. I think there will be qualifiers as people become more aware. I am not in favor of trying to control the internet, however. I don't want any laws passed in that way. That is just me.

    And I am no more scared now in the world than when I was a child. When I was starting college I was under the definite impression that we were going to die at the hands of the Russians momentarily. I think the world is in serious trouble now, much worse, but personally I don't feel more vulnerable.
    And I wish children were not raised to be so afraid of everybody and thing. They still get in the same trouble with self medication and driving as ever.
    That is more dangerous in my mind than being shown with a family on a web site.

    ginger (Just was thinking about this, planned on posting when I got home from church. Hope I didn't ramble too long.)
    After all is said and done, it is the sweet tea.
  • mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
    edited December 6, 2004
    Bb
    lynnma wrote:
    One forgets that big brother is always watching...

    Except that now, thanks to Google, Big Brother isn't the government, its EVERYONE. Strange, huh?
    Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
    A former sports shooter
    Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
    My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
  • DeeDee Registered Users Posts: 2,981 Major grins
    edited December 6, 2004
    Glad to see this here, thanks for posting
    I caught the tail end of this on the evening news but missed the beginning of it. I tried Kron.com and Kpix.com to no avail! So I'm glad to see this to fill in the beginning of the story.

    I'm just wondering what "keywords" they used to track down the photos. Always seems I use the wrong ones. There's an art to searching but no one gave me the paintbrush yet :-)

    I take lots of photos of people, but except in express cases of permission they do not appear on the web at all.
    fish wrote:
Sign In or Register to comment.