Hi all,

In the market for a good portrait lens but not sure where to start. Does anyone have recommendations? I am using a canon 60D.

I would look into the Sigma 24-70 f2.8... I have used several version of this lens and was never let down...it was added to complement my Sigma 70-210 f2.8 and replace a 28-70...

Personally I like the 70-200f2.8 for portraits...I don't have to get right in peoples faces when doing head shots and such.....either would be great.

Portraits are really multiple different applications and I like to describe them in groups:

• Head shots and head-and-shoulders.
• 3/4 length and full length.
• Environmental, group and natural settings.

For the first group, which is pretty tight to the head, on a crop/DX camera I prefer to use a longer focal length, generally 85mm or more.

For the second group I generally use 50mm or so. A 35mm lens on a crop camera can do in a smaller room.

For group portraits and when you want to record a larger scene, I recommend a standard zoom of 17-55mm(ish). The Canon EF-S 17-55mm, f2.8 IS USM is about as good as it gets for this use. For really large groups or large groups in a smaller room consider a super-wide-angle zoom, like the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X 116 Pro DX for Canon mount.

Large aperture primes allow more control over DOF, which is important for flexibility and controlling background blur (bokeh).

Thx guys,

So far I have a 10-20mm super wide angle and a 25-70 tamron, which is my mainstay. I also have a 70 to 200 L series I inherited a while back though I don't use it much.

I'm considering the canon 55mm f1.4. It comes in at around 360 and has some pretty positive reviews. What do you think?

Sorry I meant 50 mm

Originally Posted by davidryan Thx guys, So far I have a 10-20mm super wide angle and a 25-70 tamron, which is my mainstay. I also have a 70 to 200 L series I inherited a while back though I don't use it much. I'm considering the canon 55mm f1.4. It comes in at around 360 and has some pretty positive reviews. What do you think?

The 50mm is a great portrait lens, but unless you're shooting in a small space, you'll do better to use the longer end of your 28-70 or just jump to your 70-200 (which one is it?).

Alternatively, if you want something to really isolate your subject from the background, invest in something like the 85mm 1.8 or 100 f2. The 135L is also superb, but you need the space for it and, as an L lens, it's quite a bit more expensive (although pretty affordable as L lenses go, especially when it's a little slice of magic like that one).

Good input. One of the reasons I was considering the 50mm was also for the f1.4. That gobbles up the light. I think that's how I'd use it, especially in cases where I need to be close in. Hmm. Something to consider. Thx.

Depending on how much you're looking to spend, take a look at the 85mm f.1.8, which should be around the same price as the 50mm, or, look at the 135 f/2L.

If you are not in need of shallow DOF or low-light, and can deal with f/4 the Canon 24-105 f/4L is razor sharp and a a great lens that goes from wide to short tele. With your crop factor on the D60 it won't be really wide, but still a pretty nice range.

Yeah the 60d crop does present a challenge.