|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|
|
Major grins
|
Next wave of iPhone weddings...
Here are two established photographers trying their hand at iPhone weddings
http://blog.kennykim.com/2012/05/iph...raphy-101.html http://jerryghionisblog.com/2012/05/...he-iphone.html |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|
|
Disgruntled Photographer
|
I wish this apple cult would just go away.
__________________
http://evisionphotos.smugmug.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#3
|
|
|
Major grins
|
I wish same but I dont think it is only about Apple, it is about shrinking device sizes as technology expands. Film SLR people were telling same thing when first DSLR came out, why we need DSRL when we got film and now see Kodak is bankrupt and there are few handful of companies making film SLRs. Change is imminent, we accept it or not.
|
|
|
|
|
#4
|
|
|
Beginner grinner
|
I still have one foot leading towards the "old fashioned", DSLR is king ideology, whilst the the other foot is leaning towards a smaller, more back-friendly evolution of professional photography equipment.
My guess is that it will inevitable arrive one day. The OM-D is probably one of the signs that we are heading in that direction, but it isn't there just yet. The mentality of clients will have to change too. A lot of clients are still expecting photographers to use heavy and expensive equipment to take their photos, thinking it will yield to better pictures, although this is not entirely the case. I am looking for a prophet, a respected pro who shoots ALL of his work using smaller cameras (not necessarily mobile phones, but EVILs are a good place to start) and actually sells them. |
|
|
|
|
#5
|
|
|
panasonikon
|
It's not about "Apple Cult" it's about showing that you can make great photographs with almost any camera if you apply your craft well.
|
|
|
|
|
#6
|
||
|
Major grins
|
Quote:
And, Everything looks nice in a 2.5 inch square image...any issues will be magnified as you get larger.
__________________
Remember, no one may want you to take pictures, but they all want to see them. Educate yourself like you'll live forever and live like you'll die tomorrow. Ed |
|
|
|
||
|
#7
|
||
|
Big picture in the sky
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
||
|
#8
|
|
|
Wedding Photographer
|
Here's a wedding with a bunch of images I shot on my Android phone... (And some D300 images here and there)
=Matt= http://matthewsaville.com/blog/2010/...edding-photos/
__________________
“My first thought is always of light.” – Galen Rowell My Personal Portfolio • My Latest Work Moderator of the Dgrin Weddings Forum |
|
|
|
|
#9
|
||
|
EOS, therefore I am
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
||
|
#10
|
||
|
Just Getting Started...
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
||
|
#11
|
|
|
Major grins
|
we cant tell the future we can guess but from the past we can see things have developed from film to digital but the basic design hasnt changed. so the SLR/DSLR design is still with us and i can see that it will be here for sometime yet
|
|
|
|
|
#12
|
|
|
Drag that shutter!
|
If their check goes through
If their checks go through, what does it matter what you shoot with? :P It's interesting if they really did hire these photographers with the intent of only using an iPhone, that's bold. If a couple had commissioned me to do the same, I'd do it, why not? But they cannot expect the invoice to be discounted just because I'm using a camera-phone to do it all. I think its great even camera phones can do more than they used to; but I think when people commission a firm to document their wedding, they're more concerned with trusting the talent, much less their gear.
__________________
Third Eye Photography - Galleries (SmugMug :D) - Flickr - Add/Like-us on Facebook! |
|
|
|
|
#13
|
|
|
Nikonian
|
pretty damn amazing if I do say so myself. wowzers!!
|
|
|
|
|
#14
|
|
|
Casual amateur photog
|
While it proves that any tool can be utilized in the hands of the experienced, but why?
I can appreciate the principle behind it, but I don't know why it would be a logical choice. Maybe if somehow, the photog lost all of his/her gear and could only resort to an iPhone/smartphone? On a side note, The Nokia Lumia 920 is supposed to have Image Stabilization! IS on a smartphone! Who would've imagined?
__________________
-Mike Jin D800 16/2.8, f1.4 primes, f2.8 trio, 105/200 macro, SB900. It never gets easier, you just get better. |
|
|
|
|
#15
|
|
|
Major grins
|
Hahaha, I hear ya. I'm gonna guess that this whole iphoneography fad has a lot less to do with "making use of limited equipment" and a lot more with the Apple brand.
Another problem... phone photos might look decent on a computer, but they look AWFUL in print. GUP (my fave photo magazine) did a series of Iphone shots at about 6"x6" and that was already pushing it. Sure, you can use a cell phone as a hammer, but.... why would you want to? :X Also! Apple is gonna cash in and build an Apple camera next year. I'm calling it now |
|
|
|
|
#16
|
|
|
Big grins
|
Well I guess its keeping up with the times.. Not my thing
__________________
Carl Lea Wedding and Event Photographer for Wellington. |
|
|
|
|
#17
|
|
|
Major grins
|
Exactly. Love shooting with my Droid Razr/Instagram almost more than with my 5DMkII. Simplicity rocks!
|
|
|
|
| Tell The World! | |
| Similar Threads | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | ![]() |
| midnight train | REQ | Holy Macro | 17 | Mar-23-2005 06:35 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|