|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|
|
Major grins
|
Copyright... Should I wait for Certificate before Publishing
I was in Alaska recently and I was fortunate enough to capture something very cool and very rare. The professional guides I was with were making a very big deal about the photo and want to see it published.
With this is mind, I want to file for a Copyright with the USCO, but my question is this... Is it OK to publish the photo (online or elsewhere) before receiving the Copyright Certificate? My understanding is that it is OK to publish, but that I wouldn't be able to pursue legal action against anyone who may infringe on the copyright until I have received the certificate... correct? I hate to be concerned about things like this, but the photo is THAT unique that I had several business cards presented to me and comments by guides and a local naturalist that I should submit it to Nat Geo. We'll see. |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|
|
Major grins
|
Submitting to a publication is different to publishing it.
If you don't want the image copied all over the net, then don't publish it online. As for persuing legal action for those that infringe, yeah, good luck with that. The time, effort and cost of that makes it something the gullible rather than the experienced believe in. If it's some tin pot online publication they will have nothing worthwhile suing for and even if you do get awarded damages, You'll still be out of pocket. If it is someone big like Nat Geo, they will tie you up and muck around for years till you drop it in frustration. Suing and damages are something people make a lot of noise and threats over without actually having a clue what's involved. Don't listen to armchair lawyers about it, go see a real one and ask the costs and difficulties of pursuing such a case. In this case you can submit directly to the mag without risking copyright. I just wouldn't post the pic to any hosting site because a lot of the terms and conditions those have these days are dodgier than hell and would give them rights to the image as a term of usage. |
|
|
|
|
#3
|
|
|
Major grins
|
What is a Copyright Certificate?
I think you're referring to the certificate of registration that you eventually receive when you register your work. Your copyright exists from the moment you create the work by pressing the shutter. Here's what the United] S[tates Copyright Office has to say about it: Copyright Registration In general, copyright registration is a legal formality intended to make a public record of the basic facts of a particular copyright. However, registration is not a condition of copyright protection. Even though registration is not a requirement for protection, the copyright law provides several inducements or advantages to encourage copyright owners to make registration. Among these advantages are the following: • Registration establishes a public record of the copyright claim. • Before an infringement suit may be filed in court, registration is necessary for works of U. S. origin. • If made before or within five years of publication, registration will establish prima facie evidence in court of the validity of the copyright and of the facts stated in the certificate. • If registration is made within three months after publication of the work or prior to an infringement of the work, statutory damages and attorney’s fees will be available to the copyright owner in court actions. Otherwise, only an award of actual damages and profits is available to the copyright owner. • Registration allows the owner of the copyright to record the registration with the U. S. Customs Service for protection against the importation of infringing copies. For additional information, go to the U. S. Customs and Border Protection website at www.cbp.gov/. Registration may be made at any time within the life of the copyright. Unlike the law before 1978, when a work has been registered in unpublished form, it is not necessary to make another registration when the work becomes published, although the copyright owner may register the published edition, if desired. Bottom line is if you have a valuable work, make hay while the sun shines. Go ahead and register your work, but don't wait to capitalize on it.
__________________
John : Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists. D3s, D700, D300, Way more glass than the wife knows about, LR4, CS5 Last edited by Icebear; Jun-26-2012 at 03:57 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#4
|
|
|
Bill Jurasz
|
My take on this, DON'T put it online in any form until you have someone licensing that image. If it is that unique, if you have people interested in it, keep it under wraps until you've licensed it. Keep it RARE until its been licensed to help increase its value.
__________________
Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Austin TX A former sports shooter |
|
|
|
|
#5
|
||
|
Major grins
|
You have a copyright when you push the shutter, but if your copyright is not registered you are limited in the amount of damages you can claim.
If you think it is valuable you migth want to get "official" advice from a copyright lawyer rather. Bunch of copyright stuff on the sticky thread on this forum http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=97869 like http://www.photoattorney.com/ Quote:
__________________
Dan http://www.danalphotos.com http://www.pluralsight.com http://twitter.com/d114 |
|
|
|
||
|
#6
|
|
|
Major grins
|
Thanks everyone.
My main goal in registering for a copyright was simply to give myself options in the future should the photo be used in a manner that I do not approve. While I understand I technically have the copyright when I press the shutter, I've heard interviews with copyright attorneys who state that without registering the image with the USCO no attorney will agree to to take you on as a client (should you ever need an attorney). I would like to share it online (here, 500px and similar), and perhaps enter it into Nat Geo's "Your Shot" photo contest and perhaps other contests. Other than that I really don't have any idea what to do with it. It is cool and unique, but I wouldn't even know how to go about getting it published somewhere, and other than selling prints myself I don't really know how to monetize it. Suggestions? Bottom line is, wherever I post or submit it I will be sure that their terms of service allow me to retain my copyright. |
|
|
|
|
#7
|
|
|
Bill Jurasz
|
Just stay away from the photo contests. Period. Have you ever seen the terms and conditions? Almost all the time if you submit a photo you give up so many rights that any commercial use of the image is destroyed.
__________________
Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Austin TX A former sports shooter |
|
|
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
Commercial Photographer
|
Quote:
Now this doesn't mean that you should allow people to steal your images. Most companies that steal your image will remove the image in response to a letter asking for its removal. If they have published the image in print, you will get a small usage fee without much of a fight, but once the lawyers get involved, you're working basically on principle. Now if some individual steals your image it is even worse. You'll never get enough money to cover your expenses. Even if you win in small claims, the odds of getting the money rank right up there with meeting Bigfoot. The money spent for small claims court is small, but the hours involved are ridiculous. Great pics do not get posted online. Keep them in a hidden section of your website and sell them. Quote:
You have to know what publications use the type of image you have. You also have to know the schedule for the publication. Most put stories together months in advance. Of course "breaking news" shots take precedence and can be published quickly. Then you have to know how to submit to the publication. All of the magazines have submission guidelines, along with who to submit the image to (editor, director, etc.) Stay away from contests, that is such an amateur act. You're giving away your images and for what? |
||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|
|
Major grins
|
There is a lot of misinformation above, concerning your ability to collect for infringement. And, you do not do it in small claims court. It is a federal violation. Get an IP attorney who actually litigates, not just offers advice. Fed law awards attorney costs, in addition to the plaintiff's award. None of this is offered as legal advice, just a few personal comments.
Register your work.
__________________
You don’t pay me by the hour. You pay for the years of hard work that made it possible for me to paint such a picture in only one hour! Pablo Picasso |
|
|
|
|
#10
|
||
|
Major grins
|
Quote:
And as any lawyer will tell you, that is never a certainty. Have you actually engaged a copyright lawyer yourself? It is my belief that they will want money, significant money upfront on a civil case like this. In order to persue a case you have to have the upfront for the lawyer and expenses and hope to hell you do get awarded damages and costs. I'm not sure that is as definite as you say either. |
|
|
|
||
|
#11
|
|
|
pro lurker
|
Registrations are by year:
You can register images as published or unpublished. Anything posted on the web is pretty much published. For published images you are protected up to 90 days after the date of publishing, or if registered before the infringement. For now, you can register your images electronically in batches for $35 per batch. I do 5 batches a year at $35 each: i.e., once per quarter for published images, and once per year for unpublished images. The date of the last uploaded submission to that batch is the date of registration. The certificates show up in the mail several weeks after the electronic submission. Do not let the certificates impact your timing on publishing. If you are going to register your unique image, I recommend sending in some other images to register at the same time, and get your full $35 worth. |
|
|
|
|
#12
|
||
|
Have PASSPORT will TRAVEL
|
Quote:
Do you still have to send in a Disk(s) also??
__________________
"Genuine Fractals was, is and will always be the best solution for enlarging digital photos." ....Vincent Versace ... ... COPYRIGHT YOUR WORK ONLINE ... ... My Website A ZENFOLIO 10% Discount Coupon CODE - A8K-Q2K-VPG |
|
|
|
||
|
#13
|
|
|
pro lurker
|
No disk, and no limit as far as I know. The only limit is on the duration of the required upload which is ~1 hour. I do not approach this time limit, as I limit my upload groups to less than 10 minutes, so if it does not go, I have lost little time. You can upload more than one group for each registration, but the date of registration is based on the last upload to that particular registration.
|
|
|
|
|
#14
|
|
|
Major grins
|
Thanks for the input everyone. I did register my a few of my photos, not because I am looking to sue anyone, but simply to give myself more protection or options for action down the road. I figured it was worth $35 to make it official.
There's really no point in consulting an attorney at this point (and I hope I never have to) as they are just going to tell me to register my work, which I've already done. Thanks! |
|
|
|
| Tell The World! | |
| Similar Threads | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | ![]() |
| US Copyright Office Proposes to Raise Fees | OffTopic | Mind Your Own Business | 3 | May-02-2012 09:34 AM | |
| Internet forums and copyright? | ChrisFL | Mind Your Own Business | 16 | Apr-06-2012 06:46 PM | |
| ???? on copyright name | woellerd | Mind Your Own Business | 8 | Feb-26-2010 04:10 AM | |
| eCO Copyright wait time? | wsquared | Mind Your Own Business | 3 | Apr-09-2008 09:54 AM | |
| Copyright question | Baldy | The Big Picture | 19 | Jul-20-2005 06:35 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|