Lurk all you'd like, but why not register and post some pics? Registering also makes it easier to find the good stuff. Need help?

Go Back   Digital Grin Photography Forum > Gear > Accessories
Dgrinner
Password
Register FAQ Shooters Calendar Reviews Tutorials Gallery Books Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov-05-2009, 05:34 AM   #21
ziggy53
Still learnin'still lovin
 
ziggy53's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 9,114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard
I'm a little late to this party, but I was wondering if there are any problems with using CPs on a step-up ring? I work with two 67mm lenses most often, but I also have a 77mm wide angle (17-40 f/4L). I don't have a lot of money to spend, so I was thinking of getting one 77mm CP and an adapter for the others. Since I will probably be using the filter more often on the 67mm lenses, perhaps it would be a mistake.

Opinions welcome.

There are different thicknesses in step adapter rings and different materials used for their construction. I suggest getting a better quality brass adapter and mounting/demounting should not be a problem. The better brass adapters also tend to be somewhat thinner than the aluminum and definitely thinner than the plastic, so they tend to produce less vignetting as well.

On a crop camera, I should not think that vignetting would be a problem with the 17-40mm zoom, but test to be sure. On a FF sensor I would be more particular.

I use a 67-77 step-up ring myself and have no problems with my applications (but I don't use a polarizer with the 17-40mm so I haven't tested that.)

A very good explanation of the issues here:

http://www.2filter.com/prices/products/rings.html
__________________
ziggy53
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
ziggy53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-07-2009, 01:38 AM   #22
Richard
Mildly bemused
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 6,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy53
There are different thicknesses in step adapter rings and different materials used for their construction. I suggest getting a better quality brass adapter and mounting/demounting should not be a problem. The better brass adapters also tend to be somewhat thinner than the aluminum and definitely thinner than the plastic, so they tend to produce less vignetting as well.

On a crop camera, I should not think that vignetting would be a problem with the 17-40mm zoom, but test to be sure. On a FF sensor I would be more particular.

I use a 67-77 step-up ring myself and have no problems with my applications (but I don't use a polarizer with the 17-40mm so I haven't tested that.)

A very good explanation of the issues here:

http://www.2filter.com/prices/products/rings.html

Thanks, Ziggy. I'm currently shooting with a 50D so it seems like 77mm would work for me.

Another question: does multi-coating improve the image quality or just the durability? There is a (for me) big difference in price in the Hoya and B+W 77mm CPs if you go to multi-coating. My primary interest is to control reflections when shooting through plate glass windows on the street.
__________________
Richard
Moderator, Street & PJ and Other Cool Shots forums
My Stuff
Richard is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-07-2009, 03:52 AM   #23
Dan7312
Major grins
 
Dan7312's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 119
I just got some filters from http://www.2filter.com and their site has some info/examples of using coated/non-coated filters, in fact they have quite a bit of info there. But the coating only affects reflections within the filter itself which can end up appearing in the image, not reflections off of the the things you are taking a picture of.

A polarizing filter can eliminate reflections off a window, but how well it will do it depends on the angle the light is hitting the window and where you are standing.

BTW 2filter.com says that B+W filters are available in aluminum or brass and they sell only the brass ones.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard
Thanks, Ziggy. I'm currently shooting with a 50D so it seems like 77mm would work for me.

Another question: does multi-coating improve the image quality or just the durability? There is a (for me) big difference in price in the Hoya and B+W 77mm CPs if you go to multi-coating. My primary interest is to control reflections when shooting through plate glass windows on the street.
Dan7312 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-07-2009, 06:45 AM   #24
ziggy53
Still learnin'still lovin
 
ziggy53's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 9,114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan7312
I just got some filters from http://www.2filter.com and their site has some info/examples of using coated/non-coated filters, in fact they have quite a bit of info there. But the coating only affects reflections within the filter itself which can end up appearing in the image, not reflections off of the the things you are taking a picture of.

A polarizing filter can eliminate reflections off a window, but how well it will do it depends on the angle the light is hitting the window and where you are standing.

BTW 2filter.com says that B+W filters are available in aluminum or brass and they sell only the brass ones.

Additionally, multi-coated filters tend to have less effect on global image contrast, which affects our perception of image sharpness.
__________________
ziggy53
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
ziggy53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-07-2009, 10:03 AM   #25
craig_d
Grinnin'
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 281
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard
I'm a little late to this party, but I was wondering if there are any problems with using CPs on a step-up ring? I work with two 67mm lenses most often, but I also have a 77mm wide angle (17-40 f/4L). I don't have a lot of money to spend, so I was thinking of getting one 77mm CP and an adapter for the others. Since I will probably be using the filter more often on the 67mm lenses, perhaps it would be a mistake.

I don't see why a step-up ring wouldn't work; the polarizer doesn't care, and the step-up ring shouldn't cause any extra vignetting. You probably won't be able to use the step-up ring and a lens hood at the same time. Your call whether that's a deal-breaker or not. For me it would be. In your place, particularly since I tend not to use a CP on the 17-40 because of the dark-band effect that can occur with wide-angle CP shots, I would buy a 67mm CP and maybe get a 77mm CP later.
__________________
http://craigd.smugmug.com
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Canon L zooms, Canon non-L primes, and a Tokina 100mm macro
craig_d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-07-2009, 10:18 AM   #26
craig_d
Grinnin'
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 281
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan7312
But the coating only affects reflections within the filter itself which can end up appearing in the image, not reflections off of the the things you are taking a picture of.

Well, there's no such thing as a reflection "within the filter itself" -- I think what you probably mean is reflections within the camera, such as when light comes in through the filter and lens, bounces off the sensor, reflects back off the filter, and bounces back to the sensor again, creating a ghost image. But I believe you are right that the coating does not affect the polarizing function itself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan7312
A polarizing filter can eliminate reflections off a window, but how well it will do it depends on the angle the light is hitting the window and where you are standing.

And it also depends on what angle you have the CP set to. Polarized light can be oriented at different angles, and you rotate the CP to eliminate the light you don't want.
__________________
http://craigd.smugmug.com
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Canon L zooms, Canon non-L primes, and a Tokina 100mm macro
craig_d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-08-2009, 11:59 AM   #27
Richard
Mildly bemused
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 6,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig_d
... In your place, particularly since I tend not to use a CP on the 17-40 because of the dark-band effect that can occur with wide-angle CP shots, I would buy a 67mm CP and maybe get a 77mm CP later.

I think you may be right, Craig. My immediate interests are for the 67mm lenses and I don't really know whether I would ever use it on the 17-40. So with the money I'm "saving" I can get a multi-coated one. Excellent!
__________________
Richard
Moderator, Street & PJ and Other Cool Shots forums
My Stuff
Richard is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Dgrin Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


Times are GMT -8.   It's 05:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.