| Lurk all you'd like, but why not register and post some pics? Registering also makes it easier to find the good stuff. Need help? |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Shooters | Calendar | Reviews | Tutorials | Gallery | Books | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Royce
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bitterroot Mts. Idaho
Posts: 101
|
Redrock in the Clouds
Please have your way with this capture
original my adjustments ![]() I think this is my finale adjustment... Thanks for looking and help. Last edited by digidrone; Nov-03-2009 at 04:30 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Texas-Sized Grins
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,917
|
Very nice image. I think it lacks a bit of pop. A quick play in CS4 shows that your green and red are very dim, but the blue sky is dominating the levels. By masking the sky and pushing the levels and a hint of contrast, you can pull the red of those gorgeous mountains out a bit more. This was just a couple of minutes in CS4, and there are others here more skilled in the art of CS that can likely add to this.... I adjusted red/green/blue independently....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Grinnin'
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 815
|
The original doesn't quite jump out enough, but Andrew's color-adjusted version looks overdone to me. A bit more pop might be nice, but I think it has to be done with a bit more subtlety, and only to the rocks, not the tree or the grass. Conditions were obviously overcast, and that quality needs to be retained.
__________________
http://craigd.smugmug.com 35mm Digital SLR: Canon 5D Mark II 35mm Film SLR: Nikon F2, Nikon FE, Asahi Pentax SV 35mm Film Rangefinder: Konica III Medium Format Film SLR: Pentax 67 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Texas-Sized Grins
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,917
|
You are right (as usual). I looked at the grass in my edit, though it felt too yellow, but just posted it anyway figuring it wasn't final state. I personally like the tree a bunch brighter so I left that in this edit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Grinnin'
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 815
|
I like this new version better (the red rocks look just about perfect, and the overall color tone is very good), but I disagree about the tree. If the point of this picture is the majestic red-toned rocks, the tree shouldn't stand out so much. In the original picture, the tree and the grass are realistically dull (considering the overcast conditions), which I think is appropriate for this image.
As for me being "right (as usual)"... I'm sure you must be exaggerating. Can we call in B.D. for a second opinion? He and I tend to agree on principles, I think, but we very often disagree about actual pictures, and quite often, on further reflection, I end up agreeing with him.
__________________
http://craigd.smugmug.com 35mm Digital SLR: Canon 5D Mark II 35mm Film SLR: Nikon F2, Nikon FE, Asahi Pentax SV 35mm Film Rangefinder: Konica III Medium Format Film SLR: Pentax 67 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Texas-Sized Grins
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,917
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Learning grins
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 143
|
Hi Royce, I really like the image as well, altough the second of Andrew's editings looks better than the original (honestly I would not know how to improve it further myself, except maybe for a slight blue cast on the mountains, that I would remove...). The original image looks too dull and flat for this kind of subject (and I bet that the yellow of the trees and the red of the mountains looked much brighter and evident to your eyes than it has been recorded by the camera!).
What I would change is the composition, as I find the yellow trees on the right very distracting, while they add nothing to the image. I would opt for a mostly square format, and crop away the right yellow trees, to get a cleaner and more essential composition. By the way, I cannot see the original image anymore... Carmelo.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/carmelo75 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Major grins
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 792
|
where's the original image?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Texas-Sized Grins
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,917
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Major grins
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 792
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Texas-Sized Grins
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,917
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Major grins
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 792
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Learning grins
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 143
|
Agreed as well
As for this thread, I doubt that Royce got offended, as he was clearly asking for help on the editing, and often showing the result of an editing is much easier and direct than describing it... I hope he will still close this thread, I'm quite curious to know if he liked the suggestions. Carmelo.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/carmelo75 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Texas-Sized Grins
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,917
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Royce
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bitterroot Mts. Idaho
Posts: 101
|
I do thank you for your comments and your views of this capture.
I'm sorry I went missing on ya but not everyone lives or dies by the amount of posts they make per day I have been in back country shooting a video with no real world access. I wanted to see if anyone picked up on the cloning and removal of the objects, powerlines, building etc.... I do believe the extra work on the rocks does work alot better Thanks for that. I am learning still work and I haven't found a better site for this kind of help. Thanks again |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Texas-Sized Grins
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,917
|
Quote:
]
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tell The World! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|