eoren1
Mar-11-2008, 09:56 AM
I've been trying to figure out the benefits of a NAS system and whether it makes any sense to purchase one in the near future.
My current setup:
1 desktop PC running Vista and 1 macbook. All photo work done on the desktop.
My planned setup:
Media Center PC running Vista (about 500gigs storage) - will act as PVR, iTunes media center, DVD player. Would live in the living room attached to an LCD TV. It's in a nice Antec case that looks like a stereo component.
Mac mini in the home office with as big an internal drive as I can find (maybe 500 gigs) and an external firewire drive. Connected to my NEC 20inch monitor. Will do all photo work there. Not sure I can justify a Macpro for this though that would give me easier expandability and RAID if I wanted it...
Macbook for around the house work and to take on work trips. Would use the 'back to my mac' feature for accessing the mini while away.
I'm not sure where a NAS fits into this scheme. Anyone using a NAS in their photo workflow? The benefits I can see are:
Expandability. Though the firewire drive attached to the mini could serve that purpose for less money.
Ability to access the NAS from the home machines and while away. I could conceivably encode files to the NAS from the media center and play downloaded files from there as well.
As a lightroom user, I now only have CR2 files and upload processed JPGs directly to smugmug. I no longer have JPGs residing on my drive and therefore don't have those stored on smugmug. That move took away my off site backups. One of the plans for having a NAS was to partition space and allow a friend in Florida to back up over the net to me and I would do the same. That would allow for cheap easily expandable off site backups. Not sure if I could have the mac mini serve the same function.
So, am I missing some core functionality that the NAS offers? Would you change any of the above to accomodate a NAS? Would love to hear your thoughts.
E
My current setup:
1 desktop PC running Vista and 1 macbook. All photo work done on the desktop.
My planned setup:
Media Center PC running Vista (about 500gigs storage) - will act as PVR, iTunes media center, DVD player. Would live in the living room attached to an LCD TV. It's in a nice Antec case that looks like a stereo component.
Mac mini in the home office with as big an internal drive as I can find (maybe 500 gigs) and an external firewire drive. Connected to my NEC 20inch monitor. Will do all photo work there. Not sure I can justify a Macpro for this though that would give me easier expandability and RAID if I wanted it...
Macbook for around the house work and to take on work trips. Would use the 'back to my mac' feature for accessing the mini while away.
I'm not sure where a NAS fits into this scheme. Anyone using a NAS in their photo workflow? The benefits I can see are:
Expandability. Though the firewire drive attached to the mini could serve that purpose for less money.
Ability to access the NAS from the home machines and while away. I could conceivably encode files to the NAS from the media center and play downloaded files from there as well.
As a lightroom user, I now only have CR2 files and upload processed JPGs directly to smugmug. I no longer have JPGs residing on my drive and therefore don't have those stored on smugmug. That move took away my off site backups. One of the plans for having a NAS was to partition space and allow a friend in Florida to back up over the net to me and I would do the same. That would allow for cheap easily expandable off site backups. Not sure if I could have the mac mini serve the same function.
So, am I missing some core functionality that the NAS offers? Would you change any of the above to accomodate a NAS? Would love to hear your thoughts.
E