wxwax
Mar-13-2005, 09:55 AM
So says the actress I talked to last night.
She's been in the acting biz for a while. Apparently female actors need to regularly update their headshot portfolio to keep up with hair and make-up trends. So she's shot a lot of headshots in her time.
She says that in her experience, headshots shot with digital and converted to B&W don't look as authentic as those shot on B&W film.
When she compared the digital/converted shots to those shot on B&W film, she says she could immediately tell the difference, and that the digital ones didn't look as good. She says the photographer (a pro) told her everything that I did about PS conversions. She's going to bring in her portfolio so I can see for myself.
She enjoys sitting for shots and is perfectly willing to let me practice with her, which is cool. In the next few weeks I hope to have some shots (natural light only, I'm not going to be buying lighting kits) to play with.
So anyway, you guys think she has a point?
She's been in the acting biz for a while. Apparently female actors need to regularly update their headshot portfolio to keep up with hair and make-up trends. So she's shot a lot of headshots in her time.
She says that in her experience, headshots shot with digital and converted to B&W don't look as authentic as those shot on B&W film.
When she compared the digital/converted shots to those shot on B&W film, she says she could immediately tell the difference, and that the digital ones didn't look as good. She says the photographer (a pro) told her everything that I did about PS conversions. She's going to bring in her portfolio so I can see for myself.
She enjoys sitting for shots and is perfectly willing to let me practice with her, which is cool. In the next few weeks I hope to have some shots (natural light only, I'm not going to be buying lighting kits) to play with.
So anyway, you guys think she has a point?