View Full Version : 17-40L or 50 f/1.4
BBones
Feb-15-2005, 07:27 AM
Yeah yeah I know they are two different beasts. However, with one of those lenses I want to be shooting models and weddings. The 50mm lens is halfway there to the 17-40L and I would hate myself to find out that I should have saved my pennies for a couple of short months and bought the 17-40L instead.
Opinions?
DoctorIt
Feb-15-2005, 07:58 AM
Yeah yeah I know they are two different beasts. However, with one of those lenses I want to be shooting models and weddings. The 50mm lens is halfway there to the 17-40L and I would hate myself to find out that I should have saved my pennies for a couple of short months and bought the 17-40L instead.
Opinions?I think you answered your own question. :D
I love the prime lenses, but if you need a workhorse, the 50mm ain't it, in my opinion, which isn't much.
Just think of the 'extra' stuff you could buy.....
http://www.canonians.com/wideanglecompare.htm
.
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.