symbiosity

[SloYerRoll]

Click on pic for exif.

http://jbritt.smugmug.com/photos/147387780-L.jpg (http://jbritt.smugmug.com/photos/newexif.mg?ImageID=147387780)

[gchappel]

Sorry, but I don't get it.
I don't get a lot of the art at MOMA either.
Gary
gchappel

[BeaKeR]

Yeah, I don't really get it either. There's nothing that pops out as a subject to me. Is it the bridge? Or those signs the upper left? Or the river? There's just too much going on.

You could maybe try cropping it down to remove some of the clutter.

[jeffreaux2]

I'm not seeing anything either. Try to find the picture within the picture.

[Swartzy]

Honestly.....this shot lacks interest. Too many things going on here. You've got a bridge along with a couple signs (never a good thing), an out of focus tree taking up almost 1/3rd of the frame to the right (which is ok if it brings focus to something interesting). The woods around it and stream don't tell me a story other than, "Hey, here's this bridge in the woods going over a stream in broad daylight. The light is uneventful and don't see the symbiotic nature other than a bridge amongst trees.

The bridge being the subject I presume may work if reshot with different light and maybe from the underside or closer up. I'm finding it a tough pic to critique and offer help.

[SloYerRoll]

Thanks for taking a second to the post. Some of you must have read Andy's thread about orphans.:wink

Just one of those cases of my eyes making this a better shot than it was.

Lesson learned.

Que Sera.


-Jon