View Full Version : Assignment #26: Triangles
Nikolai
Mar-10-2007, 09:17 AM
OK, gang, bowls (http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=55241) went very nice..
But you know what? They were very round. Let's get something with the angles this time. Something simple. Let's shoot some triangles.
If you're totally out of ideas - some "yield" road signs will do, but this should be your last resort.
As always: fresh pictures, moderate post-processing.
For the rest of the basic rules and index please check out this sticky (http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=41800).
Let's get some triangles! :-) :wink
Antonio Correia
Mar-11-2007, 08:28 AM
Some triangles to negin with
http://antoniocorreia.smugmug.com/photos/135136287-M.jpg http://antoniocorreia.smugmug.com/photos/135136237-M.jpg
pyroPrints.com
Mar-11-2007, 10:26 AM
I shot a whole lot of triangles, these are the more interesting ones.
Turtle triangle
http://apollo.divshare.com/files/2007/03/11/215011/P3107130.jpg
Implied Triangle
http://apollo.divshare.com/files/2007/03/11/215148/P3107136.jpg
Jewish Triangles
http://apollo.divshare.com/files/2007/03/11/215149/P3107138.jpg
Sticks and Stones
http://apollo.divshare.com/files/2007/03/11/215150/P3107139.jpg
Domestic Triangles
http://apollo.divshare.com/files/2007/03/11/215151/P3107184.jpg
And just for Nik (shooting while driving, so quality sucks)
http://apollo.divshare.com/files/2007/03/11/215152/P3107158_1.jpg
Nikolai
Mar-11-2007, 10:32 AM
Some triangles to begin with
Thank you, my friend! :thumb
Nikolai
Mar-11-2007, 10:35 AM
I shot a whole lot of triangles, these are the more interesting ones.
Turtle triangle
Implied Triangle
Jewish Triangles
Sticks and Stones
Domestic Triangles
And just for Nik (shooting while driving, so quality sucks)
Great entries, very creative, thank you very much! :clap
Don't you just hate power lines? (re: Domestic)
LOL (re: Yield sign) :rofl
Cheers! :1drink
pyroPrints.com
Mar-11-2007, 10:38 AM
Don't you just hate power lines? (re: Domestic)
Yeah I do, I drive & shoot quite often (I know it's not safe, but it's fun =c). They do always seem to get in the way.
mwalters
Mar-11-2007, 03:10 PM
Stairwell, Goodrich Castle. These stairs are sandstone, parts of the castle date from the 12th Century.
http://www.airglowimaging.com/photos/135226948-M.jpg
Matthew
Nikolai
Mar-11-2007, 03:20 PM
Stairwell, Goodrich Castle. These stairs are sandstone, parts of the castle date from the 12th Century.
Matthew
Very interesting take on the triangles - and a great picture all by itself! :thumb
mwalters
Mar-11-2007, 03:32 PM
Thanks Nikolai
Matthew
wxwax
Mar-11-2007, 05:43 PM
Stairwell, Goodrich Castle. These stairs are sandstone, parts of the castle date from the 12th Century.
http://www.airglowimaging.com/photos/135226948-M.jpg
Matthew
Creative, very nice solution!
pyroPrints.com
Mar-11-2007, 10:20 PM
Stairwell, Goodrich Castle. These stairs are sandstone, parts of the castle date from the 12th Century.
Matthew
Very cool. I like this a lot.
douglas
Mar-12-2007, 07:44 AM
Stairwell, Goodrich Castle. These stairs are sandstone, parts of the castle date from the 12th Century.
Matthew
Excellent photo! Good eye for triangles:thumb
mwalters
Mar-12-2007, 10:49 AM
Thanks all for the kind comments. I've been looking for triangle everywhere today, I'll post a few later!
Matthew
mwalters
Mar-12-2007, 12:40 PM
OK, the shots aren't great but they are (kind-of) triangles...
http://airglowimaging.smugmug.com/photos/135506750-M.jpg
http://airglowimaging.smugmug.com/photos/135507145-M.jpg
http://airglowimaging.smugmug.com/photos/135507443-M.jpg
Enjoy!
Matthew
Nikolai
Mar-12-2007, 08:51 PM
OK, the shots aren't great but they are (kind-of) triangles...
Enjoy!
Matthew
I never said we require verbatim entries :wink
Thank you! :thumb
mwalters
Mar-13-2007, 11:48 AM
Out driving today:
'Powerful Triangles'
http://airglowimaging.smugmug.com/photos/135768346-M.jpg
Matthew
Antonio Correia
Mar-13-2007, 01:10 PM
Pictures shot with a 350 D + 70-200 L USM f/2.8
http://antoniocorreia.smugmug.com/photos/135774979-L.jpg http://antoniocorreia.smugmug.com/photos/135775128-L.jpg
http://antoniocorreia.smugmug.com/photos/135775403-M.jpg http://antoniocorreia.smugmug.com/photos/135775308-M.jpg
Nikolai
Mar-13-2007, 02:20 PM
Pictures shot with a 350 D + 70-200 L USM f/2.8
Nice entries, thanks!
Why XT? I thought you have 20D..:huh :scratch :dunno
Nikolai
Mar-13-2007, 02:21 PM
Out driving today:
'Powerful Triangles'
Matthew
Another good one! :clap
Antonio Correia
Mar-13-2007, 02:38 PM
Nice entries, thanks!
Why XT? I thought you have 20D..:huh :scratch :dunno
I own both Nikolai. And now I use both. Lucky guy!:D
I think you do know, only you don't remember...:D
The 350 was was for my wife but ...
Good for me.
The 16-35 is on the 20D, while the 350 is with the 70-200.
BUT
As it is much easier to shoot with 2 cameras alike, I am going to borough my daughter's 20D to go to the next travel.
Quite comfortable: 2 cameras = same procedure = no changing lens (not exactly because I may want to insert the 1.4 multiplier )
:thumb
Antonio Correia
Mar-13-2007, 03:38 PM
http://antoniocorreia.smugmug.com/photos/135817293-L.jpg http://antoniocorreia.smugmug.com/photos/135811727-L.jpg http://antoniocorreia.smugmug.com/photos/135817329-M.jpg
Nikolai
Mar-13-2007, 03:50 PM
I own both Nikolai. And now I use both. Lucky guy!:D
I think you do know, only you don't remember...:D
The 350 was was for my wife but ...
Good for me.
The 16-35 is on the 20D, while the 350 is with the 70-200.
BUT
As it is much easier to shoot with 2 cameras alike, I am going to borough my daughter's 20D to go to the next travel.
Quite comfortable: 2 cameras = same procedure = no changing lens (not exactly because I may want to insert the 1.4 multiplier )
:thumb
I see. Yes, I do remember you got both 350 and 20. I was simply wondering why you were using "the lesser body", so to speak. :wink
And yes, I agree that having multiple bodies is heaven sent! :deal
Nikolai
Mar-13-2007, 04:33 PM
some more triangles...
Nice ones, obrigado! :clap
Antonio Correia
Mar-13-2007, 04:49 PM
Nice ones, obrigado! :clap
My pleasure, Nikolai = De nada, Nikolai = Com todo o gosto, Nikolai
:thumb
StevenV
Mar-25-2007, 05:36 PM
taken with a cameraphone, so it's not the greatest tecnically, but fits the bill I think
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/187/434257339_38c2e1bb39.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevenv/434257339/)
Nikolai
Mar-25-2007, 05:39 PM
taken with a cameraphone, so it's not the greatest tecnically, but fits the bill I think
Just another proof of the fact that it's not the camera, it's the photographer...:thumb
tjmannos
Mar-30-2007, 11:01 PM
http://mannos.smugmug.com/photos/139854810-L-1.jpg (http://mannos.smugmug.com/gallery/2502792/3/139854810#139854810)
Well, when said triangle, this is the first thing that came to mind... Oh well, back to the drawing board.
- TYK
Nikolai
Mar-30-2007, 11:11 PM
Well, when said triangle, this is the first thing that came to mind... Oh well, back to the drawing board.
- TYK
This is very cool! :thumb
Welcome to Dring and welcome to the Class! :clap
tjmannos
Mar-31-2007, 02:53 PM
Hmm..
http://mannos.smugmug.com/photos/139981383-L.jpg
This is more what I was going for...but still didn't turn out like I expected.
- TYK
Nikolai
Mar-31-2007, 06:11 PM
Hmm..
This is more what I was going for...but still didn't turn out like I expected.
- TYK
What are those things?
photoj
May-29-2007, 07:55 AM
http://www.photoj.biz/photos/156940578-M.jpg
Nikolai
May-29-2007, 10:48 AM
bridge
Thank you!
When I saw your still water entry I thought it's simply a muddy water.
However, this entry has the same muddy feeling to it. I can think of several things, like:
underexposed
too many filters (maybe dirty ones)This still can be improved in post processing, methinks...
photoj
May-29-2007, 06:55 PM
Nik,
I agree. I noticed it today when I posted it from the office. I had not earlier. I am looking into it now. I also noticed it is only in the shots I took in that area. This shot and the still water shot were taken with-in 20 feet of each other. I know it is not light becuaese the angles are diffrent in both shots so I am looking into my notes to see why.
PhotoJ
PS
I did a quick look into it and a re-work. Looks like I never touched the levels when I was post processing the image. Which could be the case..a lady did drop by and ask me to shoot her wedding while I was working on these images. Its better but I still see room for improvement.
http://photoj.smugmug.com/photos/157601344-M.jpg
jopapeca
Jun-18-2008, 02:16 PM
some triangles
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3193/2591235864_22365861b4.jpg
(http://www.flickr.com/photos/jopapeca/2591235864/meta/)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3283/2590417789_f2868ac47e.jpg
(http://www.flickr.com/photos/jopapeca/2590417789/meta/)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3036/2591264016_4b1d88faa9.jpg
(http://www.flickr.com/photos/jopapeca/2591264016/meta/)
Nikolai
Jun-18-2008, 06:43 PM
some triangles
(http://www.flickr.com/photos/jopapeca/2591235864/meta/)
Thank you Paulo, nice ones!:thumb
vBulletin v3.5.2, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.