View Full Version : Buildings
GREAPER
Feb-11-2004, 04:19 PM
Just cuz things seem a little slow around here tonight, I was messin around downtown saturday waiting to to pick up my kids. I ussually dont take photos of buildings and such but there wasnt anything else there so i took this along with some other stuff.
pathfinder
Feb-11-2004, 04:44 PM
Just cuz things seem a little slow around here tonight, I was messin around downtown saturday waiting to to pick up my kids. I ussually dont take photos of buildings and such but there wasnt anything else there so i took this along with some other stuff.
I like the perspective lines - I think this picture has possibilities.... A little more saturation and clone out the antenna and power lines perhaps.....
GREAPER
Feb-11-2004, 04:51 PM
better?
pathfinder
Feb-11-2004, 05:19 PM
better?I think it looks better on my monitor at home - I like saturated colors as a rule - But more important - What do you think?
GREAPER
Feb-11-2004, 06:34 PM
Well...
This may seem a little odd, but I like them both.
The second seems a little more attractive in some ways, the cloning of the power lines and the antenna were an obvious thing i should have done had I paid enough attention to detail. The saturated colors are warm and attractive and it feels good.
The first is, I think also attractive, and the colors are a realistic presentation of the colors present at the time.
I often find that the images I like a lot, most other people do not, and ones that I do not think are my best others rave (relatively) about. I often ask Mrs GREAPER her opinion as she has very good taste in every thing but men.
So my answer is I like em both.
fish
Feb-11-2004, 07:00 PM
I kinda like this one.
so cool...like playing with Ilford high contrast paper.
pathfinder
Feb-11-2004, 07:20 PM
Well...
This may seem a little odd, but I like them both.
The second seems a little more attractive in some ways, the cloning of the power lines and the antenna were an obvious thing i should have done had I paid enough attention to detail. The saturated colors are warm and attractive and it feels good.
The first is, I think also attractive, and the colors are a realistic presentation of the colors present at the time.
I often find that the images I like a lot, most other people do not, and ones that I do not think are my best others rave (relatively) about. I often ask Mrs GREAPER her opinion as she has very good taste in every thing but men.
So my answer is I like em both.
I think you have raised a very good point - Are photographs a documentary tool to record reality/history as accurately as possible or are they a medium for interpretation and thus need to be manipulated - or as Tom Ang calls it is his book "Pixel Polishing " - to better render what the photographer/artist saw in his eye/mind rather than what was captured by the imaging sensor........
I shot in the documentary mode for a long time and never really liked the result - I finally realized the reason was that I was too unwilling to alter the image - I no longer feel this way - MY images are MY images and now I alter them at will - But I am not a scientist or a historian or a journalist, but a an artist who cannot draw very well at all and so depend on photoshop and a digital camera to help me out. Just my two cents..........
GREAPER
Feb-11-2004, 07:31 PM
I enjoy photography for the art of it, not any historical record keeping or journalistic purpose, therefore I have no ethical problem manipulating my photos.
I sometimes lack the knowledge or talent to do it well, but that is why we all strive to continue to learn.
wxwax
Feb-11-2004, 09:46 PM
Now you're talking! Nice addiiton.
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.