View Full Version : Stillness
athos
Aug-23-2006, 06:02 PM
didn't have time to drive to shoot what i want to until the weekend, so i messed about near to home.
A Still Perch
http://static.flickr.com/68/223334714_fe8597c7d8_o.jpg
Incoming Stillness
http://static.flickr.com/74/223334712_32b774c268_o.jpg
TomaS
Aug-23-2006, 06:29 PM
That is an excellent dragonfly shot:clap Having him 'pose' parallel to the lens makes for no DOF problems and all if him is sharp:thumb
Swartzy
Aug-23-2006, 06:42 PM
That's an incredible capture and comp. It looks like he has hands and is busy at work like a surgical technician. Very impressive!
Zahid Niaz
Aug-24-2006, 04:49 AM
I like the composition of Shot 1. Execellent take ! Congratulations!
douglas
Aug-25-2006, 09:17 AM
#1 is awesome!
Bendr
Aug-25-2006, 10:12 AM
Nice work,
I'm curious, what lens did you use for those?
Ben
athos
Aug-25-2006, 10:46 AM
Nice work,
I'm curious, what lens did you use for those?
Ben
thanks.
the first shot was the canon 70-300IS wide open. it would have been sharper if i didnt move forward a touch after focusing and recomposing. i was in a field next to a burned out building that the fireman use for practice to shoot a fire hydrant in the middle of a grassy field when i saw this fellow perch perfectly still for half a minute. i wish i was a bit smarter on adjusting my settings.
the second is with the sigma 105mm macro also wide open.
i went easy on the PP for the first: cropping, levels, little bit of unsharp mask, a bit of color enhancement. the second i used levels more robustly to darken the green leaves in the background of the flower bud.
i did use the free noiseware application at the very end.
they came out nice out of camera left me with not too much to do.
Awais Yaqub
Aug-25-2006, 02:50 PM
:): :): :): :):
There is nothing best then 1st one for stillness
:huh :huh :huh :huh
saurora
Aug-25-2006, 03:02 PM
That's one of the nicest dragon shots I think I've seen! It defintely shows stillness, as there's barely any out of focus areas (due to DOF) that might suggest movement. It's really wonderful. I like the flower, but not nearly the same effect for me. :thumb
Bendr
Aug-26-2006, 12:50 AM
Great job! :clap
Now everyone's trying to sell the sigma 105mm macro to me! :D
I started off convinced on the canon 100mm macro vs the other ones...
First the camera shop doesn't have the canon 100mm macro, so they showed me the sigma 105mm macro...
And now you are showing me one of your pics from the sigma 105mm... Bah!!! :D
Well, any ways... thanks for sharing! nice pics!
Ben
athos
Aug-26-2006, 08:47 AM
it's not my lens. it's my girlfriends and i get to use it :D
there are pros and cons to it. big pro is the price over the canon macro. it is 370 at sigma4less.com it is very very sharp, with amazing contrast and colors out of camera. it has a nice 13" min focusing distance which gives u some room to work.
some cons, focusing is loud. focusing is also very slow when you go from macro to non-macro shooting - it cycles through the whole barrel, and not fast. once you get it back to full range focusing, focusing is pretty quick. in low light though, when you have to focus it hunts and going through all that range takes what feels like forever. also the barrel extends, which doesnt bother me, but it does some people.
if you are going to use this for mostly macro, with some portrait shooting, this lens is great. if you are going to utilize it for less than 50% macro shooting and a lot of walkaround stuff, id go canon.
here are a few more shots from this lens, what is great is i barely have to touch the colors in pp. they come out insane.
http://athos.smugmug.com/photos/81279871-M.jpg
http://athos.smugmug.com/photos/90269991-L.jpg
Bendr
Aug-26-2006, 10:26 PM
Wow, nice colors!
Now I've handled the sigma, and it does seem to run quite nicely, though it did seem quite slow...
Now I just wish someplace had the canon such that I could pick it up and try it out...
How fast is the canon compared to the sigma, The Canon has a ring USM with full time manual right?
Anyway, I suppose this is all off-topic isn't it:rofl
Perhaps we should get back to the challenge discussion :)
Ben
athos
Aug-27-2006, 10:22 AM
Wow, nice colors!
Now I've handled the sigma, and it does seem to run quite nicely, though it did seem quite slow...
Now I just wish someplace had the canon such that I could pick it up and try it out...
How fast is the canon compared to the sigma, The Canon has a ring USM with full time manual right?
Anyway, I suppose this is all off-topic isn't it:rofl
Perhaps we should get back to the challenge discussion :)
Ben
yeah it has the fast and quiet ring usm and FTM focusing. the sigma uses a clutch. but like i said, for macro stuff, i dont find any of that a bother, it becomes second nature, and its not even my lens.
canon should be noticeably faster. basically, if the $100 difference (349.95 for a sigma w/canon mount at sigma4less vs 449.95 for the canon at b&H) means little to you, then get the canon for sure.
nalvarez
Aug-27-2006, 05:43 PM
I think both pics are very nice. I personally like #2 better, but #1 is more appropriate for this challenge.
sayntbrigid
Aug-28-2006, 05:16 AM
I love them both........I cant pick one :D
:clap:clap:clap
Sandy
Aug-29-2006, 09:48 AM
I like your dragonfly....beautful shot.
pixappeal
Aug-30-2006, 03:46 PM
Very nice shots!! :photo
raptorcaptor
Aug-30-2006, 07:35 PM
I like the first photo too!
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.