ginger_55
May-11-2006, 06:44 AM
Often I would just see the folliage move, try to locate the bird visually, then try to locate it with my lens.
The folliage was such that I often was at a very strange angle with just parts of a bird showing. Also the lighting was very contrasty. I exposed for the Hawk........or I lost the shot. Doing that, I often ended up with some "interesting" lighting that looked "out" of this world, quite literally.
http://upacreekPHOTOGRAPHY.smugmug.com/photos/68817667-L.jpg
This young hawk is IN the nest looking out. I am outside of the nest looking up: surreal.
Below is a favorite shot of mine, too contrasty and strange for many tastes, I am sure, but I like it. Someone else might, too.
http://upacreekPHOTOGRAPHY.smugmug.com/photos/68747001-L.jpg
See the young hawks and parents do not stay in the nest, they walk around the Live Oak Tree, it is kind of their own neighborhood in which they feel comfortable, and it almost hides them from any vantage point of photography. Especially as there is a rd on one side of the tree and a forbidden meadow with water on the other side, to the rt and left. That leaves front, back and under. I was under a lot, with my mouth open: scary thought!
http://upacreekPHOTOGRAPHY.smugmug.com/photos/68728400-L.jpg
I like wing flapping, they are "my" little angels, especially with the surreal lighting.
http://upacreekPHOTOGRAPHY.smugmug.com/photos/68614355-L.jpg
In working them up, I saw that these definitely have the yellow eyes of a juvenile. They just walk around up there. The parents fly in and out, to my disappointment I did not get a front shot of that. I did get many "tail end" shots. No matter which side if the huge nest I was on.
Below is the best MISS I got. I had the 400 plus extender on. I needed it when I didn't have it on, and for something like this, well, I missed. Maybe you can get an idea of size, though.
http://upacreekPHOTOGRAPHY.smugmug.com/photos/68746989-L.jpg
Below: Baby in a hammock? I don't think so, but I like to imagine it that way. I left it light for the surreal effect.
http://upacreekPHOTOGRAPHY.smugmug.com/photos/68887993-L.jpg
Shooting under a tree can make for extreme feelings of falling...........and actual falling moments. Next time I plan to concentrate on shooting a bit later, trying to get a parent posing............maybe use my flash? Definitely not shooting straight up! If they are still there.
ginger
thanks for looking.........you can comment! I understand that feelings could be mixed at best. Perhaps it is the amt of work I put in on these that makes them special for me, surreal or not. (that afternoon late is also when I got the woodpecker shot..........all shots that I am posting now. It was just Monday 5/8)
The folliage was such that I often was at a very strange angle with just parts of a bird showing. Also the lighting was very contrasty. I exposed for the Hawk........or I lost the shot. Doing that, I often ended up with some "interesting" lighting that looked "out" of this world, quite literally.
http://upacreekPHOTOGRAPHY.smugmug.com/photos/68817667-L.jpg
This young hawk is IN the nest looking out. I am outside of the nest looking up: surreal.
Below is a favorite shot of mine, too contrasty and strange for many tastes, I am sure, but I like it. Someone else might, too.
http://upacreekPHOTOGRAPHY.smugmug.com/photos/68747001-L.jpg
See the young hawks and parents do not stay in the nest, they walk around the Live Oak Tree, it is kind of their own neighborhood in which they feel comfortable, and it almost hides them from any vantage point of photography. Especially as there is a rd on one side of the tree and a forbidden meadow with water on the other side, to the rt and left. That leaves front, back and under. I was under a lot, with my mouth open: scary thought!
http://upacreekPHOTOGRAPHY.smugmug.com/photos/68728400-L.jpg
I like wing flapping, they are "my" little angels, especially with the surreal lighting.
http://upacreekPHOTOGRAPHY.smugmug.com/photos/68614355-L.jpg
In working them up, I saw that these definitely have the yellow eyes of a juvenile. They just walk around up there. The parents fly in and out, to my disappointment I did not get a front shot of that. I did get many "tail end" shots. No matter which side if the huge nest I was on.
Below is the best MISS I got. I had the 400 plus extender on. I needed it when I didn't have it on, and for something like this, well, I missed. Maybe you can get an idea of size, though.
http://upacreekPHOTOGRAPHY.smugmug.com/photos/68746989-L.jpg
Below: Baby in a hammock? I don't think so, but I like to imagine it that way. I left it light for the surreal effect.
http://upacreekPHOTOGRAPHY.smugmug.com/photos/68887993-L.jpg
Shooting under a tree can make for extreme feelings of falling...........and actual falling moments. Next time I plan to concentrate on shooting a bit later, trying to get a parent posing............maybe use my flash? Definitely not shooting straight up! If they are still there.
ginger
thanks for looking.........you can comment! I understand that feelings could be mixed at best. Perhaps it is the amt of work I put in on these that makes them special for me, surreal or not. (that afternoon late is also when I got the woodpecker shot..........all shots that I am posting now. It was just Monday 5/8)