View Full Version : "user_" vs. inline?
shaunco
Mar-15-2006, 09:36 PM
I am trying to setup my smugmug page and I see that most other users seem to have /includes/css/user_<username>.css and /includes/js/user_<username>.js files, where as all of my CSS and JS customization seems to go inline in the page (in <style> and <script> blocks)...
Why is this? I have a "Power User" account, which from the marketing materials, has the same customization features as the pro accounts ("Complete")...
-Shaun
Mike Lane
Mar-15-2006, 09:59 PM
I am trying to setup my smugmug page and I see that most other users seem to have /includes/css/user_<username>.css and /includes/js/user_<username>.js files, where as all of my CSS and JS customization seems to go inline in the page (in <style> and <script> blocks)...
Why is this? I have a "Power User" account, which from the marketing materials, has the same customization features as the pro accounts ("Complete")...
-Shaun
What happens is that the CSS is initially an inline file and then gets converted to an external stylesheet in about 10 minutes. This is to overcome some kind of caching issue that IE has. If you wait a bit you'll see that your CSS becomes external automagically. The same thing also happens with a theme's CSS.
EDIT: Oh yeah, and it happens with javascript too.
shaunco
Mar-15-2006, 10:31 PM
Ah! Thanks!
-Shaun
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.