PDA

View Full Version : Crumpler Karachi Goes for a Ride


wxwax
Mar-06-2006, 07:39 AM
My occasionaly grumpy friend Gus mentioned something about how the Crumpler Karachi, their largest backpack, fits on a motorcyle. What better way to find out, I says to myself, than to actually show him?

In the wilderness if downtown Atlanta, renowned wildlife photographer Patch29 patiently set his blind and waited for an unsuspecting Karachi-wearing motorcyclist to happen by. Patch29's years of stalki... er, observation of wildlife patterns, paid off: he caught this unsuspecting MIF (motorcyclist in flight.)

A careful study later in the lab reveals that this specimen is 6' with an inseam of 32".

http://wxwax.smugmug.com/photos/58814662-M.jpg

http://wxwax.smugmug.com/photos/58814665-M.jpg

http://wxwax.smugmug.com/photos/58815178-M.jpg


Our patch29 is nothing, if not determined. Unwilling to settle for a MIF shot of the Karachi, he gunned the MIF down (in the interests of science, of course) and seized the backpack. With nothing left alive in his immediate vicinity, Patch29 decided to model the thing himself. The results are predictably gory and not for the weak of stomach.

http://wxwax.smugmug.com/photos/58815527-M.jpg

Andy
Mar-06-2006, 07:40 AM
But there's no room for the motorcyle babe? :dunno

:lol3

wxwax
Mar-06-2006, 07:43 AM
But there's no room for the motorcyle babe? :dunno

:lol3

Thanks to my advanced degree in origami, I have learned how to fold the motorcyle babe and carry her in the Karachi. But then there's no room for a laptop, so it's a difficult choice.

DoctorIt
Mar-06-2006, 08:03 AM
Lookin' good boys! :thumb

I see the Karachi has sprouted quite a beefy waist stabilization belt. The previous gen backpacks had a thin one that was better removed altogether.

Now does Patch, the great wildlife photog have the stomach to gut the thing and show us the innards???
:ear

wxwax
Mar-06-2006, 08:54 AM
I'll eventually get around to that. The short conclusion is that I thought it would hold more that it does.

I put everything from my shorter but broader Tenba into the Karachi. It baaaarely fit. Whereas I still had room for more junk in the Tenba.

So a disappointment there. On the plus side, it feel more confortable. The padding on the back makes a difference. The shorter Tenba rides higher and is distinctly uncomfortable.

To be fair, I never used the belt on the Tenba, and it's a wide one. I wouldn't call the belt on the Karachi beefy, quite the opposite, at least compared to the Tenba. I think the Karachi scores on comfort because it's padded and it's longer, distributing the load further down the back.

I had complained earlier that the zip on the Karachi was not easy to open. Already, I see it easing up. So scratch that issue.

USAIR
Mar-06-2006, 08:55 AM
If you can read this the Babe fell off
Or something like that :huh

Fred

wxwax
Mar-06-2006, 08:59 AM
If you can read this the Babe fell off
Or something like that :huh

Fred
:lol3

DoctorIt
Mar-06-2006, 09:05 AM
To be fair, I never used the belt on the Tenba, and it's a wide one. I wouldn't call the belt on the Karachi beefy, quite the opposite, at least compared to the Tenba. I think the Karachi scores on comfort because it's padded and it's longer, distributing the load further down the back.It's beefy compared to the Schrinkle/Farmers Double. And for me, this is actually a negative - the belt (just a strap) on the Schrinkle was easy to remove because it was practically useless. As you say, these packs carry so well, there's not much need for a waist strap - so to clarify what I meant, I do not like that the Karachi seems to have a padded waist strap... unless it can be fully removed.
:ear

wxwax
Mar-06-2006, 09:11 AM
It's beefy compared to the Schrinkle/Farmers Double. And for me, this is actually a negative - the belt (just a strap) on the Schrinkle was easy to remove because it was practically useless. As you say, these packs carry so well, there's not much need for a waist strap - so to clarify what I meant, I do not like that the Karachi seems to have a padded waist strap... unless it can be fully removed.
:ear
It's not a padded waiststrap, it's a thin belt. I think you're confusing the belt with the Darien jacket. Look at the Patch piccie, made bigger here (http://wxwax.smugmug.com/gallery/61414/13/58815527/Large). You can see how insubstantial is the belt.

DoctorIt
Mar-06-2006, 09:19 AM
It's not a padded waiststrap, it's a thin belt. I think you're confusing the belt with the Darien jacket. Look at the Patch piccie, made bigger here (http://wxwax.smugmug.com/gallery/61414/13/58815527/Large). You can see how insubstantial is the belt.Ah, now I see. So it should come right off then. Excellent!

Thusie
Mar-06-2006, 10:57 AM
6' and 32 inseam:scratch Most interesting specimen.

gus
Mar-06-2006, 11:01 AM
My god you are a handsome man waxy. My beef with the karachi was not tested mate. It was that the karachi has the tripod holder in the middle of the pack thus the legs will hit the seat. With my brians-hot-tub it is on the side & thus clears the seat & juuust misses the pannier.

But i am aware that you have a 'little' tripod....

DoctorIt
Mar-06-2006, 11:15 AM
But i am aware that you have a 'little' tripod....Oh snap! :lol3

wxwax
Mar-06-2006, 11:22 AM
My god you are a handsome man waxy. My beef with the karachi was not tested mate. It was that the karachi has the tripod holder in the middle of the pack thus the legs will hit the seat. With my brians-hot-tub it is on the side & thus clears the seat & juuust misses the pannier.

But i am aware that you have a 'little' tripod....

Ah, I misunderstood you. Well, you can probably eyeball the probabilities just by looking at the shots.

wxwax
Mar-06-2006, 11:23 AM
6' and 32 inseam:scratch Most interesting specimen.

32"... and to be clear, that's a leg measurement. :lol3

Thusie
Mar-06-2006, 12:17 PM
32"... and to be clear, that's a leg measurement. :lol3

So so glad you clarified that minor detail Sid