View Full Version : What about the Tamron 200-500?
gpgold
Feb-27-2006, 08:15 AM
I've been trying to shoot some birds of late using the Canon 75-300 4.-5.6. I just started doing this recently. I'm using the 20D. I picked up a Vivitar 1.4 tele converter, but it really can't auto-focus well. I've been reading about the Tamron 200-500 5.6-6.3 and it sounds like a good value (less than $900USD). Is anyone out there using this lens. Or, do you have another recommendation?
Thanks,
Gary
Harryb
Feb-27-2006, 08:23 AM
I've been trying to shoot some birds of late using the Canon 75-300 4.-5.6. I just started doing this recently. I'm using the 20D. I picked up a Vivitar 1.4 tele converter, but it really can't auto-focus well. I've been reading about the Tamron 200-500 5.6-6.3 and it sounds like a good value (less than $900USD). Is anyone out there using this lens. Or, do you have another recommendation?
Thanks,
Gary
I would consider the Sigma 50-500 F/4-6.3 or the Canon 100-400 F/4-5.6 IS first.
cmason
Feb-27-2006, 08:31 AM
I've been trying to shoot some birds of late using the Canon 75-300 4.-5.6. I just started doing this recently. I'm using the 20D. I picked up a Vivitar 1.4 tele converter, but it really can't auto-focus well. I've been reading about the Tamron 200-500 5.6-6.3 and it sounds like a good value (less than $900USD). Is anyone out there using this lens. Or, do you have another recommendation?
Thanks,
Gary
assume you have already looked at these on FM (http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=248&sort=7&cat=43&page=1)
gpgold
Feb-27-2006, 08:37 AM
I would consider the Sigma 50-500 F/4-6.3 or the Canon 100-400 F/4-5.6 IS first.
Harry - thanks for the suggestions, your work is what originally got me interested.
regards,
Gary
gpgold
Feb-27-2006, 08:38 AM
assume you have already looked at these on FM (http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=248&sort=7&cat=43&page=1)
Thanks for the link - I'm looking now!
regards,
Gary
DanielB
Feb-27-2006, 11:51 AM
Canon 400 f/5.6L can be had under 1k in the used market... as well as the Canon 300 f/4L IS :deal
also i've heard good things about the Sigma 80-400 OS
Steve Cavigliano
Feb-27-2006, 02:04 PM
Gary,
I too read the FM Reviews prior to picking up the Bigma. The issue that scared me off of the Tamron was that most users cited "slow focus", or something akin. Not a good thing for shooting birds in flight :rolleyes
If you believe you will be at the super tele end of the zoom anyway, the aforementioned 400mm F5.6 L suggestion would merit a looksee :D It's only 400mm's versus 475mm or whatever, but it is sharp wide open. So we're probably talking F5.6 versus F9 (the zooms are sharper stopped down a stop). Which may also mean the difference between using ISO400 and ISO800 :uhoh
Steve
gpgold
Feb-27-2006, 03:31 PM
Gary,
I too read the FM Reviews prior to picking up the Bigma. The issue that scared me off of the Tamron was that most users cited "slow focus", or something akin. Not a good thing for shooting birds in flight :rolleyes
If you believe you will be at the super tele end of the zoom anyway, the aforementioned 400mm F5.6 L suggestion would merit a looksee :D It's only 400mm's versus 475mm or whatever, but it is sharp wide open. So we're probably talking F5.6 versus F9 (the zooms are sharper stopped down a stop). Which may also mean the difference between using ISO400 and ISO800 :uhoh
Steve
What about the Sigma 170 - 500, do you have any thoughts on that.
Thanks,
Gary
SCS_Photo
Feb-27-2006, 04:55 PM
Frankly, its the autofocus tracking on the 20D thats going to be the bottleneck as far as autofocusing goes. For AF on moving birds, the 20D will be the bottleneck, even with USM/HSM lenses.
Personally, I'd go with the EF 400mm f/5.6.
pathfinder
Sep-17-2006, 08:33 PM
The SP 200-500 Di Tamron lens will AF for airplanes in flight with a 1DMkll just fine I do not think it is faster or slower focusing than my Canon 100-400
http://Pathfinder.smugmug.com/photos/95926161-L.jpg
mushy
Sep-18-2006, 05:39 PM
I just purchased the Canon 100-400 for pretty much the same reasons. Its very early days but I'm very happy so far. I have a Tamron 2x extender but have not tried it yet.
nightshadow
Sep-18-2006, 07:18 PM
The SP 200-500 Di Tamron lens will AF for airplanes in flight with a 1DMkll just fine I do not think it is faster or slower focusing than my Canon 100-400
Sweet pic! The falcon and the mustang, they should make a movie
pathfinder
Sep-18-2006, 08:05 PM
Would you, perhaps, prefer a P-47 Thunderbolt and an F-16 Falcon?? From summer 2004
http://Pathfinder.smugmug.com/photos/6123058-L.jpg
nightshadow
Sep-18-2006, 08:46 PM
Would you, perhaps, prefer a P-47 Thunderbolt and an F-16 Falcon?? From summer 2004
A nice pic, but I like mustangs and corsairs
pathfinder
Sep-19-2006, 05:51 PM
Corsairs, you say!!
http://Pathfinder.smugmug.com/photos/701847-M-1.jpg
nightshadow
Sep-20-2006, 06:38 AM
Corsairs, you say!!
Neat perspective.
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.