Extreme Sharpen approach

[wxwax]

Got this from SportsShooter.com

An aggressive way to sharpen a photo, esp. one that's out of focus. To make the sharpening stronger, increase the value for the High Pass Radius. Also, you can tweak how aggressive it is by changing the Opacity of the clipping layer once you're finished. Here are the instructions.


PhotoShop old pros may be familiar with this technique, however, PhotoShop wizard Deke McCelland provided this awesome method (Secret Handshake) for enhancing a slightly out of focus image at the PhotoShop World Expo in San Francisco. Give it a try...it really works great.

1. Open your image

2. Duplicate the layer, i.e. Ctrl-J on a PC

3. Make sure the new layer is active and select FILTER --> OTHER --> HIGH PASS
When the HIGH PASS window pops up set the radius value to 2.0 for print output or between 0.2 and 0.5 for the Web.
You now have what appears to be a gray card with some image outlines.

4. With the "gray layer" still active select LAYER --> NEW ADJUSTMENT LAYER --> LEVELS

5. IMPORTANT - When the New Layer naming window pops up make sure that you check the "Use Previous Layer to Create Clipping Mask" box and click ok.

6. On the levels pop up window set the Input Levels to: [ 80 ] [ 1.00 ] [ 175 ]
Don't change the Output Level settings

7. Make the High Pass filter layer active (the gray layer) and change the blending mode to OVERLAY.

8. Make the Levels Adjustment layer active (the clipping mask) and change the blending mode to LUMINOSITY.

[hutchman]

Waxy,

I took a picture of a friend's dog, Freddie, this weekend. I broke one of my first rules of digital photography, I only took 1 image. It was worse than soft, it was out of focus. It sucked.

http://hutch.smugmug.com/photos/3797694-L.jpg


I then tried your technique:

http://hutch.smugmug.com/photos/3797693-L.jpg



The results were great. While the picture will still never win any awards, it will make Freddie's "dad" happy.

I have saved this technique as a new file under my "Cool Photoshop Tips" folder.

Thanks!

Hutch

[wxwax]

Wow, that's a rather dramatic change. I tried it on a shot of mine, and noticed that it brought out a lot of grain as well. If I wanted to get rid of the grain, I'd run it through Noise Ninja - which blurs things again!

[wxwax]

I also notice how it consistently brightens images, sometimes too much. Perhaps if the picture is prone to blown highlights, a good first step might be to reduce the levels a bit, and resave? :dunno

[hutchman]

I tried to reduce the blown out ares with levels in this one. The results were less than overwhelming so I just left it alone. I'll give it to Russ, Freddie's owner, the way it is and he'll be happy (I hope).

Hutch

[wxwax]

A couple of tips, after using this a couple of times.

On Step #3, you can go higher than the recommended values for Web use. They say between .3 and .5. but I've gone as high as 1.

Because you're working on new layers, you can use the Opacity slider to control how much sharpening you ultimately want. And you can also mask out areas where the heavy duty sharpening makes things ugly.

[John Mueller]

Instead of overlay,you can also use softlight or hardlight.With different results of course.:wink

[Steve Cavigliano]

Wow, that's a rather dramatic change. I tried it on a shot of mine, and noticed that it brought out a lot of grain as well. If I wanted to get rid of the grain, I'd run it through Noise Ninja - which blurs things again!
LOL Sid,
While I haven't tried the technique you so graciously posted, I hate using High Pass sharpening because of all the noise it brings out. If I use it, I will use it in a layer and then mask and erase all but the central subject's sharpening.

I've got to try this technique on some of my many "soft" shots tonight.

Thanks Sid :thumb

Steve

[ginger_55]

Do you think this will work on my problem Red Tailed Hawk. I am too tired to reshoot him today and the weather is not good for it, either.

Maybe I can just run him through this. Everyone keeps telling me that he is OOF and there is no hope.

ginger

[Nikolai]

blogged...

[ginger_55]

I wonder if you could set that number higher than 1 for the web. I did a series of shots. One got very sharp, sharper than the others, but I messed up somehow and rather than start over, I did some more messing, and it came out fine.

Looking at it, though, it is a very dramatic difference, so I wonder how far one could go with those numbers. (If I knew how I messed up and what I did, I would repeat it, but I don't)

ginger

[mercphoto]

While I haven't tried the technique you so graciously posted, I hate using High Pass sharpening because of all the noise it brings out. If I use it, I will use it in a layer and then mask and erase all but the central subject's sharpening.

With limited testing on some racing shots, which are often a bit soft due to panning with moving objects, I have to say I'm really impressed. I understand the noise issue, but if the image you start with is relatively noise-free, is there any other down-side to using this?

I'll be using it on images that are already pretty noise-free, and pretty well-behaved in terms of the histogram and highlights.

Before:
http://mercphoto.smugmug.com/photos/17287045-M.jpg
After:
http://mercphoto.smugmug.com/photos/17287132-M.jpg

[ginger_55]

Of all the images I did after I read this, I only had problems with one. It was cropped to about 1/3 of the original photo. I was very surprise when I saw the noise as none of my other shots had become noisy with the same treatment. But none of my other shots had been cropped, and I think they might have been shot at a lower ISO.

I put it thru Noise Ninja, it was better than the original,at least. Nice and smooth, a little bit sharper.

ginger

[wxwax]

Whoo, the difference is remarkable, Merc. Nice job! :thumb

[mercphoto]

Whoo, the difference is remarkable, Merc. Nice job! :thumb

Thanks to however it was who first posted this trick! I'm also glad it runs pretty fast, as I can batch it over a large number of images rather quickly. I'm finding this make fine details better, such as stitching in uniforms, or the lettering and edges in the decals and helmets.

I'm going to draw a conclusion. I think this is working well on this type of image because 1) the method was originally used for soft focused images, and panning shots are always a bit soft, 2) my histograms are pretty well behaved, and 3) the noise level isn't that high to begin with. I have almost convinced myself that, while I wouldn't use it for high-shutter shots or posed/still shots, I think it works very well for motion shots.

[blackwaterstudio]

Maybe its me, but it makes my images very dark. I must be doing something wrong.

[wxwax]

Maybe its me, but it makes my images very dark. I must be doing something wrong.
:scratch That's odd.