Lens detection directed against photographers?

[David_S85]

Just read this over at Rob Galbraith's...

http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_page.asp?cid=7-7886-8026

Guess that might cut down on my L purchases in the future :lol3. Perhaps if I concentrate all my efforts on pinhole photography, I can get around this?

[Nikolai]

Just read this over at Rob Galbraith's...

http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_page.asp?cid=7-7886-8026

Guess that might cut down on my L purchases in the future :lol3. Perhaps if I concentrate all my efforts on pinhole photography, I can get around this?
It's sword and shield war. They will come out with this multi-million dollar laser-computer-servo-guided devices, and we'll just buy some cheap Taiwan filter for $20 that would remove the treacherous glare:D

[David_S85]

It's sword and shield war. They will come out with this multi-million dollar laser-computer-servo-guided devices, and we'll just buy some cheap Taiwan filter for $20 that would remove the treacherous glare:DIn the mean time, while I concentrate on my artsy pinhole technique, I'm betting on Shaytech Industries, LTD. :shay to come up with a camera forcefield system allowing only the camera's owner to touch it and keep out anybody or anything else, including these new lens laser detectors thingies. :gun2

Edit: Note to Shaytech Industries, LTD.... How about a combined force field and reconfigurable concentrated gravitational lensing? Just a thought.

[Andy]

Perhaps if I concentrate all my efforts on pinhole photography, I can get around this?

you may have to do just that! intersting little (and i i do mean, little) article..