Two more from 5/30/10 Wedding

[Sam]

So far these are my two favorites.

Sam

http://www.samlinvillephotography.com/Weddings/Weddings/1783/887616056_mtWrx-M.jpg (http://www.samlinvillephotography.com/Weddings/Weddings/12164918_HDvCD#887616056_mtWrx-A-LB)

http://www.samlinvillephotography.com/Weddings/Weddings/2191/887616689_PmZ4Z-M.jpg (http://www.samlinvillephotography.com/Weddings/Weddings/12164918_HDvCD#887616689_PmZ4Z-A-LB)

[mmmatt]

Hey Sam,
Why the blur on their feet in the first one? I don't really care for that, but otherwise a nice shot. The 2nd doesn't really appeal to me at all. Top of his head angle is distracting and too tight a crop on the 2nd one to my eyes.

[Sam]

Mat,

Thanks for your honest input. I see what you mean with the first one and I went ahead and reworked it.

As for the second, this is full frame and while I like it I do need to know what others think. Wedding photography is about pleasing the clients not me, but I know there is a way to to both.

It's the constant search for perfection............which of course will never be reached. :D

Sam

[liflander]

I see Matt's point about the top of the head in #2, but I really like the angle on the bride, and that's the focus of the shot for me.
Mark

LiflanderPhotography.com

[Sam]

#2 They are dancing, no posing, 3 seconds to shoot. That's my story and I'm sticking to it! :D

Sam