ginger_55
Aug-17-2005, 07:52 AM
http://gingersnap.smugmug.com/gallery/737956/1/32478532
I am currently working on some bird photos I took yesterday august 16th at Magnolia Gardens with my 300 Prime lens, plus 1 1/4 extender. These are the ones worked up so far. Some are better than others, I am kind of working backwards in that these were towards the end of the shoot, around 6:30 (I was out of water). They are at 800 ISO in order to keep the shutter speed up.
I am trading my 300 for a 400 so I wanted to just go out and shoot. Comments are welcome, even bad ones, especially constructive as to how to improve the post work in CS. They were shot in RAW.
The first is what I would consider the best. It is an Ibis, and I don't usually like, or shoot Ibis (es), but I do like this one.
http://gingersnap.smugmug.com/photos/32478541-L.jpg
This next one is either a young Little Blue Heron (my best guess) or a snowy. I have been thinking these are snowys, but with the light beak, no yellow feet seen, even when I see the feet, I was wondering. Then I read that LBHs when young are white and often confused with Snowys. I think that is what this is.
I also think it is too dark, the bird is, I mean. I was trying to keep away from blowing it at all, but it looks a bit grey to me. If I play with it I run the risk of blowing certain areas. What do you all think? I read a thread this morning on this subject, I would be inclined to lighten it, but am curious as to others thoughts.
http://gingersnap.smugmug.com/photos/32478520-L.jpg
Next is a more mature Little Blue Heron. As a photograph, I think it is just alright. It is cropped more than most. I do not usually crop my photographs, but the trees bothered me. Maybe I should just toss this one. I kind of liked the color on the bird.
http://gingersnap.smugmug.com/photos/32478575-L.jpg
This next shot is blurry, but I did the post on it, as I liked the motion and the feather detail. Did it work? I took a chance as the eye of the bird appeared to be less blurred than the grass, say, and I thought I might have showed the motion as I wanted. I called it, The Landing.
http://gingersnap.smugmug.com/photos/32478527-L.jpg
Just walking past I noticed a "bunch" of ducks resting on an aligator "bed". I "snapped" the photo as a silhouette. I worked it up in black and white. I am not proficient at working things up in black and white. I used the channel mixer and selective color with a hint of black? Suggestions on the blk white workup? I think I used curves a bit, etc. Anything I work up in blk/white, I try to get the color right first, there was not a lot of color to work with here, and the sun made for contrast on the water.
http://gingerSnap.smugmug.com/photos/32503081-L.jpg
There is no reason you would need to comment on each of these photos, unless you want to. I am just trying to follow a suggestion I saw last night.
On the second to the last photo, I think I would burn in the grass at the bottom if I were to do it over: just want to mention what I do see myself.
Thank you for looking,
ginger
I am currently working on some bird photos I took yesterday august 16th at Magnolia Gardens with my 300 Prime lens, plus 1 1/4 extender. These are the ones worked up so far. Some are better than others, I am kind of working backwards in that these were towards the end of the shoot, around 6:30 (I was out of water). They are at 800 ISO in order to keep the shutter speed up.
I am trading my 300 for a 400 so I wanted to just go out and shoot. Comments are welcome, even bad ones, especially constructive as to how to improve the post work in CS. They were shot in RAW.
The first is what I would consider the best. It is an Ibis, and I don't usually like, or shoot Ibis (es), but I do like this one.
http://gingersnap.smugmug.com/photos/32478541-L.jpg
This next one is either a young Little Blue Heron (my best guess) or a snowy. I have been thinking these are snowys, but with the light beak, no yellow feet seen, even when I see the feet, I was wondering. Then I read that LBHs when young are white and often confused with Snowys. I think that is what this is.
I also think it is too dark, the bird is, I mean. I was trying to keep away from blowing it at all, but it looks a bit grey to me. If I play with it I run the risk of blowing certain areas. What do you all think? I read a thread this morning on this subject, I would be inclined to lighten it, but am curious as to others thoughts.
http://gingersnap.smugmug.com/photos/32478520-L.jpg
Next is a more mature Little Blue Heron. As a photograph, I think it is just alright. It is cropped more than most. I do not usually crop my photographs, but the trees bothered me. Maybe I should just toss this one. I kind of liked the color on the bird.
http://gingersnap.smugmug.com/photos/32478575-L.jpg
This next shot is blurry, but I did the post on it, as I liked the motion and the feather detail. Did it work? I took a chance as the eye of the bird appeared to be less blurred than the grass, say, and I thought I might have showed the motion as I wanted. I called it, The Landing.
http://gingersnap.smugmug.com/photos/32478527-L.jpg
Just walking past I noticed a "bunch" of ducks resting on an aligator "bed". I "snapped" the photo as a silhouette. I worked it up in black and white. I am not proficient at working things up in black and white. I used the channel mixer and selective color with a hint of black? Suggestions on the blk white workup? I think I used curves a bit, etc. Anything I work up in blk/white, I try to get the color right first, there was not a lot of color to work with here, and the sun made for contrast on the water.
http://gingerSnap.smugmug.com/photos/32503081-L.jpg
There is no reason you would need to comment on each of these photos, unless you want to. I am just trying to follow a suggestion I saw last night.
On the second to the last photo, I think I would burn in the grass at the bottom if I were to do it over: just want to mention what I do see myself.
Thank you for looking,
ginger