bobrandklev
Nov-09-2009, 05:21 AM
I can't complain about the cost of my Tamron lens as it was gifted to me for some volunteer work I did (non-photography).
It replaced an ok Canon 70-300 base lens so I will say it's better both in quality and the added zoom when motion isn't involved.
My problem, like any long lens, is the outer reaches of the lens are less crisp and blurry.
So a few weeks ago I was at a football game, sitting on the sidelines, sun at my back, Canon 50d, with the Tamron 200-500 on a mono-pod.
So my first camera settings were to put the camera in TV mode and set the shutter to the reciprocal of the longest focal point. So I set it to 1/500th of a second and let the camera pick the ISO and aperture. Not bad photos, little blurry. So I bumped up to 1/640 and 1/800 even trying 1/1000.
First question is with the 1.6 crop factor of the 50d I actually have a 750mm lens so should I set my shutter faster like 1/750th of a second?
Next I set the camera in AV mode and opened up to the widest aperture 5.6 the lens would allow. I noticed the 1/500 or greater froze the action but the colors were very weak. My goal here was better lighting and color.
Problem now was color was better but shutter speeds fell to 320 and 250 at times so there was noticeable blur. I then tried bumping up the ISO but as I got to high I started getting grain.
So my biggest question: Was I just doing this wrong and is there a better way to think about this situation balancing Shutter, Aperture and ISO?
OR:
Is it just time (in these situations) to think about getting a faster lens?
Thanks for any feedback,
Bob
It replaced an ok Canon 70-300 base lens so I will say it's better both in quality and the added zoom when motion isn't involved.
My problem, like any long lens, is the outer reaches of the lens are less crisp and blurry.
So a few weeks ago I was at a football game, sitting on the sidelines, sun at my back, Canon 50d, with the Tamron 200-500 on a mono-pod.
So my first camera settings were to put the camera in TV mode and set the shutter to the reciprocal of the longest focal point. So I set it to 1/500th of a second and let the camera pick the ISO and aperture. Not bad photos, little blurry. So I bumped up to 1/640 and 1/800 even trying 1/1000.
First question is with the 1.6 crop factor of the 50d I actually have a 750mm lens so should I set my shutter faster like 1/750th of a second?
Next I set the camera in AV mode and opened up to the widest aperture 5.6 the lens would allow. I noticed the 1/500 or greater froze the action but the colors were very weak. My goal here was better lighting and color.
Problem now was color was better but shutter speeds fell to 320 and 250 at times so there was noticeable blur. I then tried bumping up the ISO but as I got to high I started getting grain.
So my biggest question: Was I just doing this wrong and is there a better way to think about this situation balancing Shutter, Aperture and ISO?
OR:
Is it just time (in these situations) to think about getting a faster lens?
Thanks for any feedback,
Bob