PDA

View Full Version : The "How Did You Do That?" Question


benjikan
Sep-03-2009, 01:50 AM
he "How Did You Do That?" Question

I am often asked the question How Did You Do That? I could very simply answer the question which I often do and the results that person gets isn't what he/she was expecting. If I talk about post production, yes the actions on the image will be as I recommended, but when asked about the results of a shoot, I more often than not get a disappointing, "it doesn't look like yours...!"

Now, I will not go in to a lengthly diatribe about what is required to put a shoot together, as I have covered that topic ad-infinitum in several of my articles. What I am trying to explain here will be quite difficult, but I will attempt to do so here.

Imagine a huge globe and that globe is the culmination of all of the information you have accumulated over the many years of experience you have acquired in your craft. You might wish to call it a brain, but for my purposes, let's call it a huge floating globe. All of the information is stored in that globe and inter connected and accessible at any moment in time. The speed at which the information is accessed is astounding. So much so, that you are often not aware of the process for how you collected all of the elements to get to the final output or finished product.

The more elements within the globe the more complex the output possibilities become. Let us call these elements in the globe "epiphany events". Epiphany Events are those events that occurred during a learning process that had a paradigm shifting effect on how you viewed your reality. These types of events will create a completely new subset of elements to draw from for future products creations, photos, music, dance, sports etc...

You are probably wondering where am I going with all of this. Well just hang in there for a while and I may just get to the point.

The more elements in your globe the more possible permutations and the more permutations the more potential elements that can be placed in to your globe for future use.

Now, what happens during the act of creation when some element that has not yet been added to your globe is presented to you? You get what most of us would call disorientation. The time it takes to integrate this element could be from a nano second to the complete rejection of that element, or worse yet the ignoring of it all together. It is often under those circumstances that some of the greatest creations occur and the epiphany happens. I like to call them, creative accidents.

When I am on a creative roll, I cannot recall all of the elements that are in action during the process until I take a break and stop to think about it for a moment. I don't know if any of you have ever thought about what is going on in your head during a photo shoot. The more elements in your globe the more complex the computations. You can never really be missing elements in your globe. You may have less or more, but there is no such thing as missing elements. Just less elements to choose from and what ever you create will be a direct reflection of the elements you had available to create what you did.

What I have retrospectively recalled in thinking about my own process, is that I am dealing with literally thousands of considerations during the act of creating an image that come to light so quickly that if I were to stop during the process and think about it, I would stall to a HALT.

It is never just the technique and it is never just the creation during the process. It is everything from thinking about the last time you cleaned your ears to is there enough fill light to I must try to stop being so self deprecating to I need to increase the speed of the Fan to get the hair moving a bit more.

Your random thoughts will effect which elements you access as well and those thoughts are often what trigger the brilliant idea. The reason so many of you out there are not getting what you want has a lot less to do with technique than allowing yourself to be open to the possibilities of allowing elements in to your globe that may give you the freedom to fly. I know that sound corny. But being creative is SO much more than the camera you use or all of that other stuff. I could show you what I did technically for a shoot and more often than not the results will not be satisfactory to you. Why? Because the elements I had to draw from are not as yet art of your Global Repository. Just to prove my point here. The other day a posted an image of a man on a park bench. Now, rather than presenting it horizontally, I presented in vertically, as it gave the impression of him being crucified. I would say that over 80% of the viewers could not handle looking at the image without crooking their heads to see it in a horizontal position. Now those that rejected it did not allow the "Element" to enter their globe. They will never see in another perspective until they let disorienting elements in to their globe. Those that did have added a new element and thus a new perspective for how to view "Reality".

The old "How did you do that?" question never really suffices. It can introduce new elements in to your globe, but they will NEVER be exactly like the formula of another persons Global Experience.

Now..."How did I do that?"

http://www.benjaminkanarekblog.com/?p=1289

AaronNelson
Sep-03-2009, 06:20 AM
Im going to need to read this again... great post!

gvf
Sep-03-2009, 06:58 AM
I think if people are asking how I did it, it's due to my losing the forest for the trees and making the shot about technique rather than about the moment captured -

Photog4Christ
Sep-03-2009, 07:13 AM
Hey! Great shot! How did you do that???!!!! :D

CoryUT
Sep-03-2009, 08:38 AM
Good post. A good way to present this idea to people is to tell them to take something they are good at and force themselves to think about it.

Many people are fast typers. Tell them to think about their keystrokes the next time they type and observe just how tremendous the decrease in speed is. The process of setting up a shot is very similar.

Qarik
Sep-03-2009, 03:58 PM
well written sir..a good expository on the creative process.:thumb

kdog
Sep-03-2009, 07:08 PM
The next time somebody asks me how I did that, I think I'm going to read them this essay. :giggle

rwells
Sep-08-2009, 12:32 PM
Benjamin,

I try to catch all your post and read them. I like your thinking pattern, and also your efforts to try to shed some light to others so that the "artist" inside can start to arise.

I have to personally agree with what you say with one small detour. IMHO, one needs to get comfortable with the technicals before you can just let those work in the background, without much laborious thought. (Although I think you've also covered that in your "globe" scenario)

I find it easier to be more creative now than when I was "learning" the technicals. (albeit, we never know it all ~ always learning/experimenting) I do find that on a personal level, I have to force myself to approach a shot creatively, due to the re-assurance of knowing how a shot will turn out if done "by the book". I'm naturally an "out-of-the-box" type person, but I still have to make sure I'm not taking the easy (boring) path. (Because post processing is also a main ingredient to an image, I'm also including it when I refer to creating an image)

Thank you for taking the time and effort to lay these things out for all to consume. Looking forward to your next "article".

pathfinder
Sep-08-2009, 01:17 PM
I think I agree with benjikan's description of a creative effort - it is the culmination of countless hundreds of decisions, ideas along the way, some conscious, some not, based on the life experience of the artist and their milieu, along with unplanned interactions, culminating in a new image or a new rendering.

The only problem with this kind of description, is that it does not help an aspiring artist hoping to learn from his seniors. They are doomed to finding their own new way into and through the wilderness, so to speak.

I agree with Randy, you cannot get to this non-conscious creative state, until the technicals of camera, lighting, and post production are all second nature, requiring no conscious thought.

For me, it is "seeing the image" before I shoot it, that really helps. I cannot shoot what I cannot "see" - and I mean "see" in the sense of the final edited image, not what I see through the viewfinder.

I find shooting panos or HDRs helps some, precisely because you do not see them "through the viewfinder" but by looking at the world, and realizing that you can capture what you are viewing in its glorious detail. Then the secret is being able to see 'the light and the color' clearly and as you would have it rendered.