View Full Version : anyone have the Sigma 28-70 2.8
lilmomma
Jul-09-2009, 08:26 AM
if so how is it? I found a good deal on a used one and was thinking about buying it. thanks!
Cygnus Studios
Jul-09-2009, 08:54 AM
I have it. It is okay overall. Really hits the sharpness at F4 and will focus fast in low light situations. I prefer the Tamron 28-75mm but if you can get a good deal on the price, take it.
Edited to add correct Tamron lens
cmason
Jul-09-2009, 09:27 AM
if so how is it? I found a good deal on a used one and was thinking about buying it. thanks!
Very good reviews found here: http://www.pbase.com/lightrules/shootout
And other lenses, such as the Sigma 24-70 reviewed as well: http://www.pbase.com/lightrules/lenstests
lilmomma
Jul-09-2009, 11:11 AM
Hmmm...What about the sigma 18-50mm f2.8? Didn't find a great deal on that one but wondering if I should spend more or just grab the 28-70 for the heck of it?
ziggy53
Jul-09-2009, 02:04 PM
I have the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC (the model before the current "Macro" version) and I like it a lot. It misses focus every once in a while but not so often to be more than a nuisance. I use it as my backup lens for event work but I often use it for family/personal stuff.
I do think that the Tamron 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di-II LD SP Aspherical (IF) is somewhat better and still very reasonable in price.
Rob Pauza
Jul-11-2009, 03:36 PM
I have the Sigma 24-70 2.8 EX DG. It stays on my camera at least 90% of the time. I absolutely love it. I have 5 Sigma lenses and have become a big fan of them. The build quality of the Sigma EX lenses are great. They are extremely robust and aren't plastic-feeling like most other lenses. Focus is fast and sharp at all ranges, even in low light. F2.8 through the zoom range is a nice plus.
It does use 82mm filters, which are more expensive. The added size of the front of the lens, plus the petal hood will block the on-camera flash toward the 24mm side, but hopefully you won't be using simply a built-in flash. All in all, I LOVE this lens. For the price, I don't think you can go wrong.
-Rob Pauza
Rob Pauza Photography
Art Scott
Jul-11-2009, 04:06 PM
I had the 28-70 but found it was not wide enuff for me...so I sold it and then purchased the 24-70 f2.8 DG EX.....which was a bit better but still not wide enuff....both focused quite fast even in low light...sharp as tack ...both were.....but still left me wanting more on the wide end.
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.