thedude
May-24-2009, 02:12 PM
At first I thought this was pretty clear to me but now I've got some doubts. After some "research" I had concluded that the Nikon D90 and D300 pretty much share the same viewfinder. With one exception: the 94% coverage for the D90 vs a 100% coverage for the D300.
So that's good news in favour of the D300... but the guys over at Neocamera.com suggest that the effective size of the viewfinders of the D80/D200/D90/D300 are all the same (i.e.: 0.626).:scratch
So what does this mean: do the viewfinders of all of these models appear the same size to our eyes?
If so, this would contradict a lot of the claims that the D300's viewfinder is "bigger" and "brighter" (which is something I doubted as well at first, as the brightness strongly depends on whether you're peering through a fast or slow lens.
So for those of you who've had a chance to compare the D90 and D300 side-by-side: is there a noticeable difference in the viewfinder size/brightness using the same lens?
So that's good news in favour of the D300... but the guys over at Neocamera.com suggest that the effective size of the viewfinders of the D80/D200/D90/D300 are all the same (i.e.: 0.626).:scratch
So what does this mean: do the viewfinders of all of these models appear the same size to our eyes?
If so, this would contradict a lot of the claims that the D300's viewfinder is "bigger" and "brighter" (which is something I doubted as well at first, as the brightness strongly depends on whether you're peering through a fast or slow lens.
So for those of you who've had a chance to compare the D90 and D300 side-by-side: is there a noticeable difference in the viewfinder size/brightness using the same lens?