viewing cameraphone pictures....

[Zombie64]

So.. for those of you lucky enough, as I am, to have a cameraphone.. there's a cool free site that just launched recently called snapnpost.com - It's pretty much like the rest of the moblogs out except that it has a lot of neat little features, like privacy functions (so you can control who views your gallery,) and an API feature (so you can host a satellite of the gallery on your on site..) Check it out.

[wxwax]

:thumb Cool, thanks Zombie. And welcome to dgrin! I haven't see a site like that before. Kinda fun. I'm beginning to understand the fun of having a camera on the telephone. The concept was lost on me before - all I could see was the telephone company making extra money off of long transmission times each time a photo was sent.

[gus]

sniff...sniff ...strong smell of tinned bully beef in the air.

[wxwax]

You're probably right. Let's see if Zombie makes a return.

[gus]

"Anyone who is lucky enough to have a camera phone" :huh Id rather own an eel.


Have you seen the pics from one of them ? good for making stamps.

[wxwax]

True. But what I like is that you always have it on you. And so you're going to make a pic that you might not have made otherwise... capture a moment, a feeling, a look. Very spontaneous. That's when the content overcomes the style. I see shots like that in the galleries on the site, and that's what I like about it.

I do see a lot of bad image quality, vignetting, camera shake etc. I wonder if the quality of the cams will improve, or if that's not a priority for those involved.

[lynnma]

True. But what I like is that you always have it on you. And so you're going to make a pic that you might not have made otherwise... capture a moment, a feeling, a look. Very spontaneous. That's when the content overcomes the style. I see shots like that in the galleries on the site, and that's what I like about it.

I do see a lot of bad image quality, vignetting, camera shake etc. I wonder if the quality of the cams will improve, or if that's not a priority for those involved.well said Sid..

[gus]

I would still rather an eel....

[wxwax]

:rofl :rofl

[Quenda]

I carry my camera everywhere I go, not looked at a camera phone, and not interested. I can't imagine you would ever get a decent photo from one. Ok for fun, I suppose, but I think as someone said, the carrier's are the winners on this one.


Q.

PS....Not too sure I would rather eat an eel though.....:D

[gus]

I be pattn' him matey...not eatin' him. Now if he were jellied...that'd be different.


Camera phones are for drunk chicks in nightclubs...

[wxwax]

Camera phones are for drunk chicks in nightclubs...

Exactly!!!

[GREAPER]

A) there is absolutley NOTHING wrong with drunk chicks in a nightclub,

and

B) Eel aint that bad.

[DoctorIt]

A) there is absolutley NOTHING wrong with drunk chicks in a nightclub,

and

B) Eel aint that bad.a) agreed

b) agreed. local sushi place has excellent eel rolls - nice sweet taste compliments the seaweed saltiness.

c) how bad can we hijack this thread?
:D

[gus]

.

[BylLuvaul]

You guys should check this out . this camera phones pictures are amazing (for a camera phone) http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=377221