View Full Version : What's the difference?
scoox
Mar-03-2009, 10:59 AM
Hey everyone,
can anyone tell me, why this
http://www.keh.com/OnLineStore/ProductDetail.aspx?groupsku=MA079990032620&brandcategoryname=35MM&Mode=searchproducts&item=0&ActivateTOC2=false&ID=&BC=MA&BCC=1&CC=7&CCC=2&BCL=&GBC=&GCC=&KW=
only costs half of this
http://www.keh.com/OnLineStore/ProductDetail.aspx?groupsku=MA07999047223J&brandcategoryname=35MM&Mode=searchproducts&item=0&ActivateTOC2=false&ID=0&BC=MA&BCC=1&CC=7&CCC=2&BCL=&GBC=&GCC=&KW=
?
They seem to have pretty much the same specs and are both EX :scratch
aj986s
Mar-03-2009, 11:10 AM
The more expensive one is newer and the following feature:
"Minolta's new "D" lenses feature Distance Encoding that provides refined multi-segment metering for manual focusing."
But not being a Minolta owner.......I'm not sure what it means. :dunno
Art Scott
Mar-03-2009, 11:10 AM
Hey everyone,
can anyone tell me, why this
http://www.keh.com/OnLineStore/ProductDetail.aspx?groupsku=MA079990032620&brandcategoryname=35MM&Mode=searchproducts&item=0&ActivateTOC2=false&ID=&BC=MA&BCC=1&CC=7&CCC=2&BCL=&GBC=&GCC=&KW=
only costs half of this
http://www.keh.com/OnLineStore/ProductDetail.aspx?groupsku=MA07999047223J&brandcategoryname=35MM&Mode=searchproducts&item=0&ActivateTOC2=false&ID=0&BC=MA&BCC=1&CC=7&CCC=2&BCL=&GBC=&GCC=&KW=
?
They seem to have pretty much the same specs and are both EX :scratch
Your 1st link was to an "i" verson of the lens and the 2nd is to a "D" version and this part of the "D"s description says it all I think............
Wide focusing ring for better, comfortable control, with a non-rotating front element that allows a polarizer to be used.
Minolta's new "D" lenses feature Distance Encoding that provides refined multi-segment metering for manual focusing
The "i" version is not an internal focusing lens and if the"D" is not a front focus at lest the front element does not rotate allowing the use of circular polarizers which is a huge difference between the 2........plus the "D" has the distance encoding that the "i" does not have........
If it were me and I was thinking of purchasing the 2nd one I would save a bit more and get a Sigma 24-70 f2.8 or 17-70 f2.8-4 ......but that would be just my preference............
bmoreshooter
Mar-03-2009, 11:12 AM
Hey everyone,
can anyone tell me, why this
http://www.keh.com/OnLineStore/ProductDetail.aspx?groupsku=MA079990032620&brandcategoryname=35MM&Mode=searchproducts&item=0&ActivateTOC2=false&ID=&BC=MA&BCC=1&CC=7&CCC=2&BCL=&GBC=&GCC=&KW=
only costs half of this
http://www.keh.com/OnLineStore/ProductDetail.aspx?groupsku=MA07999047223J&brandcategoryname=35MM&Mode=searchproducts&item=0&ActivateTOC2=false&ID=0&BC=MA&BCC=1&CC=7&CCC=2&BCL=&GBC=&GCC=&KW=
?
They seem to have pretty much the same specs and are both EX :scratch
Since both are used lenses it is up to the seller to determine their value. One is Ex and the other Ex+. Also their original selling price may have been different. One could be a couple years older than the other.
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.