Redland Theatre

[p27rpy]

Just posting up some new photos I took of The Redland Theatre which is on 59 halfway between Lufkin and Nacogdoches.

Someone wanted to have one of the photos enlarged and framed for his office. He wanted the photo to make the theatre look big and majestic. Which one do you think accurately portrays that?

Also, on the pic with the moon, that was photoshopped in as the person requested. Does it look real enough?

http://civitello.smugmug.com/photos/385836977_mwbYv-L.jpg
http://civitello.smugmug.com/photos/385837036_e4VTE-L.jpg
http://civitello.smugmug.com/photos/385837116_AHz6X-L.jpg
http://civitello.smugmug.com/photos/385837314_pEAGZ-L.jpg
http://civitello.smugmug.com/photos/385837377_UjUhz-L.jpg

[Deanna Alko]

Nice drive-in!

I favor the compositions and feel of #2 & 3. Although, I could do without the lovers graffiti visible in #3.

Take care,
- Deanna

[Tee Why]

Nice big moon in the last shot. Nice to see these old drive ins.

[roentarre]

The texture really draws me in. Great series :clap

[p27rpy]

thanks for your input yall!

i personally like #s 2&4 the most. i think #4 has the most interesting composition, so hopefully that's the one to go to print... but its all up to the buyer!

[jstpeter]

I would go with 1. the close ups do not give you enough sense of space to give you a gramd majestic feel. The straight on shot is a little to boring which IMO takes away from the grand majestic feel. #1 give the viewer enough space to realize size and at the same time gives you that "punch" that says here I am!