gpphotos
Nov-15-2008, 07:55 AM
hey folks.
We shoot a lot of white background stuff since it seems to sell so well here, but we've been having a couple of time-consuming problems with the images.
The first problem is the background. it looks a tad dirty and dingy, and the proofs come back from the lab looking pretty bad unless i fix the background. Here's an example of what i'm talking about:
http://gpphotos.smugmug.com/photos/417405331_6JpjG-L.jpg
now, normally i would select the background using the magic wand tool, then do a curves adjustment that blows out the background, then desaturate the background (more on why later). If there is nothing white in the foreground (clothes, props, ect) then it's very easy to select the background quickly but i end up having to do a lot of detail work with the history brush if there is white on props or on the subject.
This is fine for a couple of images, and they look pretty good when we get them from the lab. The problem is that it takes a very long time to do this to an entire proof order of say, 40 proofs. Since we offer to sell the proofs, they need to look good. If anyone has a quick way to blow out the background without a time-consuming process, feel free to clue me in :)
The other problem we're having is with the lab. First let's take a look at this image:
http://gpphotos.smugmug.com/photos/417406327_LC7LU-L.jpg
now, this is an extreme curves adjustment to show the problem areas of the background. The problem we're having with the lab is that if there is even a hint if shadow on the background or under the subject, then when we get back the proofs, these shadows have little color swirls in it, and i think it is from where the lab color corrects the image, or maybe from the printer profiles not matching what's in my computer (we work with more than 1 lab, and i don't know what photos are going to what lab.) Hince why I desaturate the background once i have it selected. Even doing that, occasionally we have a problem with it. Blowing out the background takes away most of this problem as well, but again...it's still an issue.
any thoughts?
We shoot a lot of white background stuff since it seems to sell so well here, but we've been having a couple of time-consuming problems with the images.
The first problem is the background. it looks a tad dirty and dingy, and the proofs come back from the lab looking pretty bad unless i fix the background. Here's an example of what i'm talking about:
http://gpphotos.smugmug.com/photos/417405331_6JpjG-L.jpg
now, normally i would select the background using the magic wand tool, then do a curves adjustment that blows out the background, then desaturate the background (more on why later). If there is nothing white in the foreground (clothes, props, ect) then it's very easy to select the background quickly but i end up having to do a lot of detail work with the history brush if there is white on props or on the subject.
This is fine for a couple of images, and they look pretty good when we get them from the lab. The problem is that it takes a very long time to do this to an entire proof order of say, 40 proofs. Since we offer to sell the proofs, they need to look good. If anyone has a quick way to blow out the background without a time-consuming process, feel free to clue me in :)
The other problem we're having is with the lab. First let's take a look at this image:
http://gpphotos.smugmug.com/photos/417406327_LC7LU-L.jpg
now, this is an extreme curves adjustment to show the problem areas of the background. The problem we're having with the lab is that if there is even a hint if shadow on the background or under the subject, then when we get back the proofs, these shadows have little color swirls in it, and i think it is from where the lab color corrects the image, or maybe from the printer profiles not matching what's in my computer (we work with more than 1 lab, and i don't know what photos are going to what lab.) Hince why I desaturate the background once i have it selected. Even doing that, occasionally we have a problem with it. Blowing out the background takes away most of this problem as well, but again...it's still an issue.
any thoughts?