Communities and co-branding

[mercphoto]

At first I thought this was an issue with only one (of 3) communities I belong to, but it appears I was wrong about that. When I joined the Motocross community and associated one of my galleries with that community, my gallery aquired the co-branding of the person who started the community. Ick. Obviously I didn't like that since it had his name plastered over my galleries.

I'm also in the Texas community, and I have a footer from that person's co-branding rather than my own.

Is this the way things should work? I like the idea of communities, but not the lack of control over the header and footer of my galleries that I'm seeing.

[onethumb]

At first I thought this was an issue with only one (of 3) communities I belong to, but it appears I was wrong about that. When I joined the Motocross community and associated one of my galleries with that community, my gallery aquired the co-branding of the person who started the community. Ick. Obviously I didn't like that since it had his name plastered over my galleries.

I'm also in the Texas community, and I have a footer from that person's co-branding rather than my own.

Is this the way things should work? I like the idea of communities, but not the lack of control over the header and footer of my galleries that I'm seeing.

You have the option in your gallery as to whether to use smugmug or community cobranding.

Don