InsuredDisaster
Jul-23-2008, 04:53 AM
I bought a Sigma 30 1.4 for my Nikon D300 and found it suffered from front focus. So I dialed in about 15 for the AF fine tune. Its now pretty good. However, I found that the Nikon 50 1.4 looks clearer with 15 tuned in as well, though I'd never notice it without having been looking specifically for it.
(I was doing this test at 1.4)
My questions: Both the 50 (nikon) and the Sigma look better with the AF fine tune, though I've not tested it with all of my lenses (I will.) But the Sigma looks horrible without the fine tune. So, is does this indicated superior glass in the Nikon? If the camera is 15 off for all of my lenses, can I/ should I have the camera retuned?
I'm going to look at the D70 with the lense as well to see if it also seems less sharp.
Otherwise, the Sigma is pretty nice. To of course live up to Sigma's spotty QC, the HSM focus on my 10-20 is silky smooth. The 30 feels gritty. The 18-200's zoom sticks.
My nikons (50 1.4 and 70-200 2.8VR) are of course wonderfully sharp and perfect.
(I was doing this test at 1.4)
My questions: Both the 50 (nikon) and the Sigma look better with the AF fine tune, though I've not tested it with all of my lenses (I will.) But the Sigma looks horrible without the fine tune. So, is does this indicated superior glass in the Nikon? If the camera is 15 off for all of my lenses, can I/ should I have the camera retuned?
I'm going to look at the D70 with the lense as well to see if it also seems less sharp.
Otherwise, the Sigma is pretty nice. To of course live up to Sigma's spotty QC, the HSM focus on my 10-20 is silky smooth. The 30 feels gritty. The 18-200's zoom sticks.
My nikons (50 1.4 and 70-200 2.8VR) are of course wonderfully sharp and perfect.