darryl
Jul-20-2008, 09:03 AM
So, InsuredDisaster recently brought up the topic of Guerilla Photography. I've always thought that sneaking a camera (http://austinpowers.smugmug.com/Music) into a concert in your pants or otherwise is the ultimate guerilla photography.
I've never had the balls (ahem) to stick a camera or big lens down there.
But I have brought my admittedly smaller Digital Rebel and Canon S3 to Seattle's Bumbershoot on numerous occasions. And I've never had any problems* shooting whatever I wanted.
However I have noticed that many of these outdoor music festivals like Bumbershoot, including Bonnaroo, and the upcoming Outside Lands in San Francisco, have official policies of "no professional cameras", which is always defined as "detachable lenses".
When pressed, the promoters always claim that it's by artist request that "professional" cameras are prohibited. Now a co-worker that shoots concerts and musicians gave me an earful about how you could get in trouble for trying to sell (or even posting on a website?) photos of an artist or band without getting their permission, etc. So there's that. (And I know my local San Jose Museum of Art prohibits photography of exhibits, so I could see that being an issue at Bumbershoot with their various art installations.)
But there's also the fact that there is plenty of stuff to shoot at a music festival besides the artists. What about shooting the audience, passers-by, the Space Needle, etc?
And what about enforcement? When I went to Bumbershoot a few years back, I was worried enough to bury my camera beneath a bunch of diapers. But recently I was challenged to show that my Canon S3 did *not* have a detachable lens before being allowed into the "Main Stage" arena where Crowded House was performing.
ANYWAYS, my point is, in today's world of ultrazooms (with great video capabilities as well, which is always prohibited at these events), camera phones, and ever cheaper DSLRs, it seems like concert promoters are going to have an increasingly difficult time prohibiting people from taking quality photos and video.
Anyone have thoughts on the issue?
Here's some links for thought:
- Bumbershoot: the arbitrary "professional camera" definition (http://www.michaelhanscom.com/eclecticism/2005/08/31/no-cameras-at-bumbershoot/)
- Bonnaroo: Friday, 1:05am - I'm reprimanded for my camera (http://www.stevemathewes.com/blog/2008/06/bonnaroo_2008_worth_the_waits.html)
I've never had the balls (ahem) to stick a camera or big lens down there.
But I have brought my admittedly smaller Digital Rebel and Canon S3 to Seattle's Bumbershoot on numerous occasions. And I've never had any problems* shooting whatever I wanted.
However I have noticed that many of these outdoor music festivals like Bumbershoot, including Bonnaroo, and the upcoming Outside Lands in San Francisco, have official policies of "no professional cameras", which is always defined as "detachable lenses".
When pressed, the promoters always claim that it's by artist request that "professional" cameras are prohibited. Now a co-worker that shoots concerts and musicians gave me an earful about how you could get in trouble for trying to sell (or even posting on a website?) photos of an artist or band without getting their permission, etc. So there's that. (And I know my local San Jose Museum of Art prohibits photography of exhibits, so I could see that being an issue at Bumbershoot with their various art installations.)
But there's also the fact that there is plenty of stuff to shoot at a music festival besides the artists. What about shooting the audience, passers-by, the Space Needle, etc?
And what about enforcement? When I went to Bumbershoot a few years back, I was worried enough to bury my camera beneath a bunch of diapers. But recently I was challenged to show that my Canon S3 did *not* have a detachable lens before being allowed into the "Main Stage" arena where Crowded House was performing.
ANYWAYS, my point is, in today's world of ultrazooms (with great video capabilities as well, which is always prohibited at these events), camera phones, and ever cheaper DSLRs, it seems like concert promoters are going to have an increasingly difficult time prohibiting people from taking quality photos and video.
Anyone have thoughts on the issue?
Here's some links for thought:
- Bumbershoot: the arbitrary "professional camera" definition (http://www.michaelhanscom.com/eclecticism/2005/08/31/no-cameras-at-bumbershoot/)
- Bonnaroo: Friday, 1:05am - I'm reprimanded for my camera (http://www.stevemathewes.com/blog/2008/06/bonnaroo_2008_worth_the_waits.html)